httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: AW: Config Bug in proxy_balancer?
Date Mon, 27 Mar 2006 22:18:02 GMT
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 03/27/2006 10:03 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> 
> >>
> > 
> > What we needed to avoid was the case where a balancer defined in
> > VhostA leaked into VhostB. You should not be able to define
> > balancers in one Vhost and have them available in others; it's
> 
> That makes things clearer to me. Thanks. BTW: I agree with this.
> 
> > certainly a weird regression. Now *inheriting* one from the main
> > server does make sense, kindof, and that's what we're trying
> > to do here.
> 
> Ok, but this actually works already without your patch.

I never even bothered to check... Brian's initial
Email said that it didn't. Are you saying that his Email
is wrong and that balancers defined in the main server
conf via <Proxy>, as well as their workers, ARE fully
inherited by Vhosts?

-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
	    "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."

Mime
View raw message