httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: Should fastcgi be a proxy backend?
Date Mon, 06 Mar 2006 16:05:22 GMT
Garrett Rooney wrote:
> 
> On 3/6/06, Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com> wrote:
> > I think the whole issue revolves around whether the balancer
> > should, or should not, pre-open connections and manage them
> > internally, or whether it should be one-shot. The real
> > power is being able to load balance, and implement
> > that in a central location.
> >
> > So it seems to me that some sort of Balancer member
> > option that determines whether or not the connection
> > is "persistent" or not would alleviate some of
> > the issues you raise.
> 
> We actually have a way to do that, it's the close_on_recycle flag, and
> I had to turn it on in order to get anything approaching reliability
> for fastcgi.
> 

That's how we do it *internally* and not what I meant. I meant
more a parameter to be set in httpd.conf...


-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
	    "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."

Mime
View raw message