Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 58968 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2006 06:50:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jan 2006 06:50:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 89629 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2006 06:50:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 89344 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2006 06:50:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 89333 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jan 2006 06:50:30 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 22:50:30 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [204.127.202.55] (HELO sccrmhc11.comcast.net) (204.127.202.55) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 22:50:27 -0800 Received: from [192.168.0.5] (c-24-6-134-233.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[24.6.134.233]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP id <200601270650050110098h4he>; Fri, 27 Jan 2006 06:50:05 +0000 Message-ID: <43D9C29D.3070304@bfoz.net> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 22:50:05 -0800 From: Brandon Fosdick User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Time for 2.0.56 ? References: <20060123034203.GA25609@dochas.stdlib.net> In-Reply-To: <20060123034203.GA25609@dochas.stdlib.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Colm MacCarthaigh wrote: > I've been extremely busy for the last month, and it doesn't look like > I'll have much time for coding in the next few weeks. If anyone wants to > work on execd stuff fire away, most of what I have uncommitted is a mash > of things I have to clean up. In December, Joe Orton posted a patch to ap_config.h that took care of some problems with AP_INIT_TAKE1. Is there any chance this patch will be included in 2.0.56?