Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 51646 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2005 13:50:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Dec 2005 13:50:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 92319 invoked by uid 500); 19 Dec 2005 13:50:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 92143 invoked by uid 500); 19 Dec 2005 13:50:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 92132 invoked by uid 99); 19 Dec 2005 13:50:37 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:50:37 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [209.133.199.10] (HELO jimsys.jagunet.com) (209.133.199.10) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:50:36 -0800 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jimsys.jagunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C7883E23E for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 08:50:16 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) In-Reply-To: <43A5DED4.7060709@apache.org> References: <43A43D86.2020006@apache.org> <8EEEDC0F-634E-459E-89EA-AC872326E3AA@jaguNET.com> <43A58749.3070903@apache.org> <43A5DED4.7060709@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <72A5F4B7-BB0B-485F-9983-F6AD0CBC73C2@jaguNET.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jim Jagielski Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: 2.2 mod_http_proxy and "partial" pages Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 08:50:15 -0500 To: dev@httpd.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Dec 18, 2005, at 5:12 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > > On 12/18/2005 06:21 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > [..cut..] > >> >> My thoughts were something more like a ap_http_error_ofilter >> which simply checks for the error bucket and does appropriate >> things; something very general that the full http chain can >> use. > > Also an interesting idea. Do you already have further applications > for this in > mind apart from the current problem? > Not yet, but certainly a generic solution provides greater flexibility for other things that might want to use it in the future :)