Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 88183 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2005 11:01:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Dec 2005 11:01:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 2291 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2005 11:01:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 2273 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2005 11:01:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 2262 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2005 11:01:17 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 03:01:17 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [207.155.252.12] (HELO sheffield.cnchost.com) (207.155.252.12) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 03:01:16 -0800 Received: from [192.168.0.21] (c-24-13-128-132.hsd1.il.comcast.net [24.13.128.132]) by sheffield.cnchost.com id GAA24430; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 06:00:55 -0500 (EST) [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.17] Errors-To: Message-ID: <43981209.4020209@rowe-clan.net> Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 04:59:21 -0600 From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc3 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Directions for Win32 binary httpd References: <438F84B6.2070909@rowe-clan.net> <438FA469.60905@ActiveState.com> <4390A98E.9010406@rowe-clan.net> <43916290.3050202@rowe-clan.net> <002001c5f814$1462f0b0$0100a8c0@mother> <4391E466.5010800@rowe-clan.net> <010e01c5fbe4$01b9db80$b30ea8c0@LAPTOP016> In-Reply-To: <010e01c5fbe4$01b9db80$b30ea8c0@LAPTOP016> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Francis ANDRE wrote: > Why don't you plan to use ant for the building process instead of > namke/make. The major avantage of using ant would be to get a coherent, > unique process for all majors platforms like WXP, Linux, Unix, OS/400, > OS/390 Excellent suggestion! Why don't you propose a patch to the APR project to build APR (a required component) using ant as an alternative to make? Bill