Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 95018 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2005 20:47:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Dec 2005 20:47:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 62620 invoked by uid 500); 6 Dec 2005 20:47:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 62571 invoked by uid 500); 6 Dec 2005 20:47:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 62560 invoked by uid 99); 6 Dec 2005 20:47:27 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 12:47:27 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [209.133.192.6] (HELO devsys.jaguNET.com) (209.133.192.6) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 12:47:27 -0800 Received: (from jim@localhost) by devsys.jaguNET.com (8.11.7a/jag-2.6) id jB6Kl5x06489; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 15:47:05 -0500 (EST) From: Jim Jagielski Message-Id: <200512062047.jB6Kl5x06489@devsys.jaguNET.com> Subject: Re: 2.2 mod_http_proxy and "partial" pages To: brian.akins@turner.com (Brian Akins) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 15:47:01 -0500 (EST) Cc: dev@httpd.apache.org, jim@jagunet.com Reply-To: jim@jagunet.com In-Reply-To: from "Brian Akins" at Dec 06, 2005 03:38:26 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Brian Akins wrote: > > Colm MacCarthaigh wrote: > > > I'm already testing, with some pretty big edge cases, sounds > > good. > > > > Also looks good from my side. I'll do some more testing. We, as you > can imagine, get tons of "edge cases." > I likely can't approach some of the edge cases you can, but I can concur that it looks good. As Roy indicates, we may need to tweak this to return a 503 depending on the actual state of the proxied connection/response, but this is still looking v good. -- ======================================================================= Jim Jagielski [|] jim@jaguNET.com [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."