Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 91227 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2005 00:50:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Dec 2005 00:50:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 80278 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2005 00:50:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 80004 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2005 00:50:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 79149 invoked by uid 99); 2 Dec 2005 00:50:21 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 16:50:21 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [209.133.192.6] (HELO devsys.jaguNET.com) (209.133.192.6) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 16:50:48 -0800 Received: (from jim@localhost) by devsys.jaguNET.com (8.11.7a/jag-2.6) id jB20mwm14448 for dev@httpd.apache.org; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 19:48:58 -0500 (EST) From: Jim Jagielski Message-Id: <200512020048.jB20mwm14448@devsys.jaguNET.com> Subject: Re: [Fwd: [users@httpd] [announce] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.0 Released] To: dev@httpd.apache.org Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 19:48:54 -0500 (EST) Reply-To: jim@jaguNET.com In-Reply-To: from "William A. Rowe, Jr." at Dec 01, 2005 04:57:14 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > > I know I'm beating a dead horse here, but I still don't > > understand the reason for such a "rushed" release, when > > an extra few days would likely have resolved them... > > Because it's httpd-dev tradition, .0 releases are never ready, and most > RM's live to regret them, yet new RM's are always ready to step in :) :) With 1.3 now basically in idle-mode, I'm hoping to scratch my RM itch with 2.2.x's -- ======================================================================= Jim Jagielski [|] jim@jaguNET.com [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."