Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 10:15:07 +0000
From: Colm MacCarthaigh <colm@stdlib.net>
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [vote] 2.2.0 tarballs
Message-ID: <20051201101507.GA4224@dochas.stdlib.net>
Reply-To: colm@stdlib.net
References: <438E0EEC.5020509@rowe-clan.net>
 <200511302123.00584.nick@webthing.com>
 <20051130212757.GA28370@dochas.stdlib.net> <438E44EF.4090706@rowe-clan.net>
 <20051201004947.GA30534@dochas.stdlib.net> <438E4D8D.9080909@rowe-clan.net>
 <20051201012538.GD30534@dochas.stdlib.net> <438E9464.5090005@rowe-clan.net>
 <2985793C-B748-4231-8613-0959EDDB83AB@gbiv.com>
 <438ECB2D.40200@rowe-clan.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <438ECB2D.40200@rowe-clan.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 04:06:37AM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Ok, but did you try installing into a tree that has, say, a fink port of
> svn based on apr 1.0 or 1.1?  We are (mostly) talking about where httpd
> is finding stale APR versions related to non-httpd packages.  (Non-httpd,
> because httpd never has shipped anything but alphas based on 1.0 or 1.1.)

But are there any of these that we know of? fink's apr is 0.9 ;

http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/package.php/apr

and its svn depends on that too. This has got to affect a vanishly small
user base of people who know what they're doing :)

-- 
Colm MacC�rthaigh                        Public Key: colm+pgp@stdlib.net