httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [vote] 2.2.0 tarballs
Date Thu, 01 Dec 2005 20:46:05 GMT


On 12/01/2005 08:15 AM, Sander Temme wrote:
> 
> On Nov 30, 2005, at 10:53 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> 


[..cut..]

>> Is buildconf present?  If the user runs it, does it corrupt the 
>> unpacked tree?
>>
>> If this is so, and it's broken, then perhaps remove buildconf 
>> throughout the
>> tree, and the autoconf source files, resulting in a vanilla ./
>> configure for
>> the resulting distribution package?
> 
> 
> Hm... you kinda need it if you drop in a custom module with its 
> config5.m4 foo. Or if you want to build with a different libtool than 
> httpd came with. I agree that's kinda deep though.
> 

BTW: buildconf is also used by the rpm spec file that is delivered with the tar ball.

> I wouldn't hold up the release for it.

+1

Regards

RĂ¼diger

Mime
View raw message