httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <>
Subject Re: [vote] 2.2.0 tarballs
Date Thu, 01 Dec 2005 10:50:37 GMT
Joe Orton wrote:
> If some random user has APR 1.1 installed in /usr/local/apr, and builds 
> httpd 2.2 with --prefix=/usr/local/httpd-2.2, it would be a Bad Thing 
> (and certainly, very surprising behaviour) if that httpd install went 
> ahead and silently upgraded that APR install.

AGREED!  Never silent - in fact if there is a conflict, present the user
two command line options to choose between.

> (APR 1.x has never been shipped in a Subversion tarball)

<light bulb>

Seriously?  No applications?  That significantly weakens my initial
objection, although still, this should be fixed soonish.


View raw message