httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Maxime Petazzoni <maxime.petazz...@bulix.org>
Subject Re: Vote for mod_mbox 0.2 release
Date Fri, 23 Dec 2005 23:49:33 GMT
* Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com> [2005-12-23 15:13:47]:

> --On December 24, 2005 12:00:57 AM +0100 Maxime Petazzoni 
> <maxime.petazzoni@bulix.org> wrote:
> 
> >Btw, why does this tarball should be called 0.2.1 ? Just because I
> >changed some files in the archive ? I just need some explainations :
> >since 0.2.0 was never released, why sould we increment the revision number
> >to 0.2.1 ?
> 
> Yes, a release is one-shot only.  Once you announce it, it's technically 
> "burned."  This is why we don't have release candidates...  It is either 
> approved or it isn't.  -- justin

Since this tarball was not yet a release, does it still apply ? You're
getting self-contradictory here :)

- Sam
-- 
Maxime Petazzoni (http://www.bulix.org)
 -- gone crazy, back soon. leave message.

Mime
View raw message