httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Francis ANDRE" <francis.an...@easynet.fr>
Subject Re: Directions for Win32 binary httpd
Date Thu, 08 Dec 2005 10:41:54 GMT
Why don't you plan to use ant for the building process instead of 
namke/make. The major avantage of using ant would be to get a coherent, 
unique process for all majors platforms like WXP, Linux, Unix, OS/400, 
OS/390

FA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
To: <dev@httpd.apache.org>
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 7:31 PM
Subject: Re: Directions for Win32 binary httpd


> Steffen wrote:
>>> From a build standpoint I agree.
>>
>> But VC++ 2005 has improvements in Performance, MemoryManagement etc.
>> The optimizer seems  to improve the performance quite significantly.
>>
>> Contrary to what Microsoft would like, you can built the server with the
>> needed DLLs statically so there is nothing to ship and nothing to 
>> install.
>> The Sambar Server( www.sambar.com ) uses this approach.
>
> Steffan, you aren't considering the structure of httpd(!)  Loading three
> dozen modules and several libraries, each with embedded Clib functions is
> quite sub-optimal ;-)  For a monolithic program, I agree with your 
> assessment.
>
> Of course, feel free to build under VC 2005 (freely for the next year!).
> We are talking about maximum flexibility for distribution purposes, only.
>
> Bill
>
> 



Mime
View raw message