Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2)
In-Reply-To: <438C0984.8060008@force-elite.com>
References: <438C0984.8060008@force-elite.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <5387596C-652D-47BB-A7ED-FA9B5F543864@wsanchez.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Wilfredo_S=E1nchez_Vega?= <wsanchez@wsanchez.net>
Subject: Re: [vote] 2.2.0 tarballs
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 17:37:31 -0800
To: dev@httpd.apache.org

   +1 on Mac OS.

	-wsv


On Nov 28, 2005, at 11:55 PM, Paul Querna wrote:

> These tarballs are Identical to 2.1.10 except for two changes:
>
> * include/ap_release.h Updated to be 2.2.0-release
> * The root directory was changed from httpd-2.1.10 to httpd-2.2.0
>
> Available from:
> http://people.apache.org/~pquerna/dev/httpd-2.2.0/
>
> Please vote on releasing as GA/Stable.
>
> I am sorry for the confusion on whole move of 2.1.10 to 2.2.0.  This
> entire situation is completely undefined in our VERSIONING file, and
> hasn't ever happened before with these versioning rules.
>
> I believe the best way to move forward for everyone is to vote on  
> these
> 2.2.0 tarballs.  Hopefully we can all learn from this, and come up  
> with
> a better VERSIONING policy by the time we do 2.4.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paul.