Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 98449 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2005 20:45:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Nov 2005 20:45:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 21577 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2005 20:45:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 21529 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2005 20:45:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 21512 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2005 20:45:06 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 12:45:06 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [69.225.174.131] (HELO x.win.covalent.net) (69.225.174.131) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 12:44:59 -0800 Received: from [192.168.0.21] ([24.13.128.132]) by x.win.covalent.net over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:42:51 -0800 Message-ID: <43725F6A.1070600@rowe-clan.net> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 14:43:22 -0600 From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc3 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: pgp trust for https? References: <006f01c5e56c$48a32fd0$0201a8c0@PJC> In-Reply-To: <006f01c5e56c$48a32fd0$0201a8c0@PJC> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Nov 2005 20:42:51.0843 (UTC) FILETIME=[274CB930:01C5E56E] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Folks, somehow this thread diverged from HTTP/1.1 PGP based TLS mechanisms into a fun-with-hardware-trust thread. Please take this discussion to an appropriate security-wonk debating club forum, such as vuln-dev or bugtraq, as it's all entirely off topic on this forum. Yours, Bill