Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 07:57:53 -0800
From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com>
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [vote] 2.2.0 tarballs
Message-ID: <20051129155753.GM28636@scotch.ics.uci.edu>
Mail-Followup-To: Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com>,
	dev@httpd.apache.org
References: <20051129150359.GA20200@redhat.com>
 <200511291516.jATFGAJ25937@devsys.jaguNET.com>
 <20051129152246.GH28636@scotch.ics.uci.edu>
 <200511291542.09518.nick@webthing.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200511291542.09518.nick@webthing.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11

On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 03:42:07PM +0000, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 November 2005 15:22, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> 
> >     We can note it in the release
> > notes and move along.  -- justin
> 
> Indeed, that's fine by me.
> 
> I've just committed a documentation update to Trunk.
> If we backport that to branch-2.2, I'll withdraw my objections.

We can note it in the release notes and backport your docco change to the
2.2.x branch and update the website.  However, I wouldn't go so far as
changing the docs in the tarball.  -- justin