Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
From: Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com>
Message-Id: <200511291528.jATFSkK26210@devsys.jaguNET.com>
Subject: Re: [vote] 2.2.0 tarballs
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:28:43 -0500 (EST)
Reply-To: jim@jaguNET.com
In-Reply-To: <20051129152246.GH28636@scotch.ics.uci.edu> from "Justin
 Erenkrantz" at Nov 29, 2005 07:22:46 AM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:16:04AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > mod_dbd is explicitly mentioned as a new feature of 2.2
> > and, therefore, a compelling reason to upgrade. Either
> > we stop refering to mod_dbd as something special enough
> > to warrant special attention as a core enhancement or
> > we fix it so it *is* one.
> 
> The fact that no one has ever cared to make mod_dbd work on Windows until
> the precise instance that we're to go to GA is complete evidence that this
> is not a showstopper.  It's not even in the default build!
> 
> It can wait until the next release of 2.2.  We can note it in the release
> notes and move along.  -- justin
> 

I would agree, as long as we remove it for the What's New
pages until it actually works and builds.

My point, obviously, was that we can't have it both ways and
say mod_dbd is great and a new core enhancement if it doesn't
even build under Win32. 

-- 
=======================================================================
 Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
           "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."