Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 76741 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2005 10:07:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Nov 2005 10:07:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 94364 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2005 10:07:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 94336 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2005 10:07:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 94325 invoked by uid 99); 5 Nov 2005 10:07:08 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 02:07:08 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [80.229.52.226] (HELO asgard.webthing.com) (80.229.52.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 02:07:03 -0800 Received: from asgard (asgard [192.168.10.2]) by asgard.webthing.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F5D964591 for ; Sat, 5 Nov 2005 10:08:05 +0000 (GMT) From: Nick Kew Organization: WebThing Ltd To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Edge connection filter cannot be removed? Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 10:08:02 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <436C605F.6000206@force-elite.com> In-Reply-To: <436C605F.6000206@force-elite.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511051008.04628.nick@webthing.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Saturday 05 November 2005 07:33, Paul Querna wrote: > I believe that this is really a feature enhancement. It is not a > regression from the 2.0.xx branch. I don't believe it should be a show > stopper for 2.2.x. Is this documented anywhere like bugzilla? My gut feeling is that if it's not a regression then it's not a showstopper at this stage. How does it achieve showstopper importance: does it violate HTTP or something? -- Nick Kew