httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <>
Subject Re: [vote] 2.2.0 tarballs
Date Thu, 01 Dec 2005 06:53:22 GMT
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 10:35:07PM -0800, Sander Temme wrote:
>>I'm looking at this. If you give that apu buildconf the right --with- 
>>apr parameter, buildconf completes. The problem is, if the  
> Just to reiterate - buildconf is not necessary for users to run.
> Therefore, if it's broken for 2.2.0, it's not a showstopper.  -- justin

Is buildconf present?  If the user runs it, does it corrupt the unpacked tree?

If this is so, and it's broken, then perhaps remove buildconf throughout the
tree, and the autoconf source files, resulting in a vanilla ./configure for
the resulting distribution package?

View raw message