httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r349582 - /httpd/httpd/tags/2.2.0/
Date Tue, 29 Nov 2005 02:14:04 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 05:59:29PM -0800, Roy Fielding wrote:
> 
>>What?  No, sorry, -1.  Your vote was on releasing 2.1.10.  You should be
>>releasing 2.1.10 to the public as GA.  2.2.0 is different -- it requires
>>new documentation and a new tarball, and thus new votes.
> 
> 
> But, um, we can't do that under our versioning rules.  Only 2.2.x can be
> called GA.
> 
> (The docs in the 2.1.10 tarball should not need to be changed as it
> already reports itself as 2.2 there.)
> 
> My vote (and I believe the intent of the folks who voted for GA status)
> was specifically for allowing this tarball to be called 2.2.0.  -- justin

Hmm. That's what I thought I was voting on. And I certainly understood
that Paul meant that too.

- --
Rich Bowen
rbowen@rcbowen.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDi7lsXP03+sx4yJMRAg4/AJ9xviNYdgLQEiTCOIi5kOPhv0LRHACgiYjk
HhfyBklUpylwn8fI4WTJ6RU=
=yi3N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Mime
View raw message