httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Geoffrey Young <ge...@modperlcookbook.org>
Subject Re: proposed authz rewrite (was:Re: Suggest renaming mod_authz_host to mod_access_host)
Date Mon, 28 Nov 2005 17:38:55 GMT

>>or wathever. Killing AuthtType is good in that it propably lets you
>>combine different Accesses with Auth much cleaner.
>>
>>Dw
> 
> 
> Good point.  After thinking about it, it seems that AuthType could be
> eliminated completely.  The authentication type is already implied by
> the use of the directives AuthBasicProvider, AuthDigestProvider or any
> other AuthXXXProvider that may come along in the future.  Does anybody
> see a need to keep AuthType around at all under the new authentication
> architecture?

I'm going a few rounds at the moment with a user that's confused between
ap_auth_type(r) and r->ap_auth_type, and why ap_auth_type(r) needs to be set
at all if he's writing his own non-basic-non-digest authentication scheme.
making the authtype indigenous to the provider mechanisms make a decent
amount of sense to me.

--Geoff

Mime
View raw message