httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Colm MacCarthaigh <c...@stdlib.net>
Subject Re: svn commit: r349713 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/Makefile.win
Date Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:36:31 GMT

I'm not near my windows box, and the universal inability of any search
engine to allow me to search for the literal string "$MAKE" is geting to
me.

Does anyone know exactly which is correct;
	
	"$MAKE"
or
	"($MAKE)"
	
I can reverse engineer the answer tomorrow, but it's still annoying me
now. It looks to me, and some others, like the latter would evaluate to
"(NMAKE)" and yet when I made the change it got rid of the syntax error,
and it looked like a compile with /nologo. Is nmake syntax really that
broken?

On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 12:37:06PM -0000, colm@apache.org wrote:
> Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/Makefile.win
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/httpd/httpd/trunk/Makefile.win?rev=349713&r1=349712&r2=349713&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- httpd/httpd/trunk/Makefile.win (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/Makefile.win Tue Nov 29 04:37:03 2005
> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@
>  
>  !IFNDEF MAKEOPT
>  # Only default the behavior if MAKEOPT= is omitted
> -!IF "$(MAKE)" == "NMAKE"
> +!IF "($MAKE)" == "NMAKE"
>  # Microsoft NMake options
>  MAKEOPT=-nologo
>  !ELSEIF "($MAKE)" == "make"
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Colm MacCárthaigh                        Public Key: colm+pgp@stdlib.net

Mime
View raw message