httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: [vote] 2.2.0 tarballs
Date Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:52:30 GMT
Joe Orton wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:28:43AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:16:04AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > > > mod_dbd is explicitly mentioned as a new feature of 2.2
> > > > and, therefore, a compelling reason to upgrade. Either
> > > > we stop refering to mod_dbd as something special enough
> > > > to warrant special attention as a core enhancement or
> > > > we fix it so it *is* one.
> > > 
> > > The fact that no one has ever cared to make mod_dbd work on Windows until
> > > the precise instance that we're to go to GA is complete evidence that this
> > > is not a showstopper.  It's not even in the default build!
> > > 
> > > It can wait until the next release of 2.2.  We can note it in the release
> > > notes and move along.  -- justin
> > > 
> > 
> > I would agree, as long as we remove it for the What's New
> > pages until it actually works and builds.
> > 
> > My point, obviously, was that we can't have it both ways and
> > say mod_dbd is great and a new core enhancement if it doesn't
> > even build under Win32. 
> 
> Win32 is not special.  It's a second-class citizen if anything because 
> it gets so little developer attention.
> 

Now *that's* a statement for the Release Notes :)

-- 
=======================================================================
 Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
           "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."

Mime
View raw message