Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 3188 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2005 18:52:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Oct 2005 18:52:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 7914 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2005 18:52:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 7891 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2005 18:52:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 7874 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2005 18:52:45 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 11:52:45 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [204.146.167.214] (HELO Boron.MeepZor.Com) (204.146.167.214) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 11:52:47 -0700 Received: from [9.27.38.32] (dmz-firewall [206.199.198.4]) by Boron.MeepZor.Com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j9DIpthe019475 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:52:15 -0400 Message-ID: <434EAC82.8010501@apache.org> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:50:42 -0400 From: Greg Ames User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-1.4.1 (X11/20050719) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: async write completion prototype References: <434A11BC.5080406@force-elite.com> <434EA46F.9000509@apache.org> <434EA93E.7080107@turner.com> In-Reply-To: <434EA93E.7080107@turner.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Brian Akins wrote: > Basically, I was referring to the overall hits a box could serve per > second. > > with 512 concurrent connections and about an 8k file, 2.1 with worker > served about 22k request/second. event served about 14k. do you recall if CPU cycles were maxed out in both cases? thanks, Greg