Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99728 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2005 23:19:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Oct 2005 23:19:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 36032 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2005 23:19:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 35802 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2005 23:19:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 35791 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2005 23:19:37 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:19:37 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [81.56.215.125] (HELO mail.bulix.org) (81.56.215.125) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:19:34 -0700 Received: from skikda.appart.bulix.org ([10.0.0.10]) by frog with smtp (Exim 4.54) id 1ESjgl-0004un-93 for dev@httpd.apache.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 01:19:12 +0200 Received: by skikda.appart.bulix.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 21 Oct 2005 01:19:10 +0200 Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 01:19:10 +0200 From: Maxime Petazzoni To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: mod_mbox spinning processes on ajax Message-ID: <20051020231910.GC440@bulix.org> Mail-Followup-To: dev@httpd.apache.org References: <4352AFEA.2090503@slive.ca> <20051016230859.GE16817@bulix.org> <4353B8FC.3090104@slive.ca> <20051018053432.GK17803@bulix.org> <4357FC2A.3050903@slive.ca> <20051020224948.GA440@bulix.org> <20051020230927.GB440@bulix.org> <15D3C908823DF28021A40060@st-augustin.ics.uci.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JgQwtEuHJzHdouWu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <15D3C908823DF28021A40060@st-augustin.ics.uci.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --JgQwtEuHJzHdouWu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline * Justin Erenkrantz [2005-10-20 16:16:56]: > >I've just commited a small changeset in order to compute the string > >length only once in the function. But yes, we could rely on the > >computed length earlier in the body processing. > > I wonder if fixing the loop would mean that we could remove the >50k > limitation. It should only have to iterate 450,000*2 times which isn't > *that* expensive. =) -- justin I had the same idea, but I must go to bed now. May you try if you have some spare time ? I'll take a look at it tomorrow if you did not. - Sam -- Maxime Petazzoni (http://www.bulix.org) -- gone crazy, back soon. leave message. --JgQwtEuHJzHdouWu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDWCXu7KsOe4Pmrg0RAvuUAKCC8/P6GJUePkXXoNpb4IjVgSRmQACfYiFD jpnZibcg0x5PO+za2jNlQ3c= =DpyZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JgQwtEuHJzHdouWu--