Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 93904 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2005 14:47:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Sep 2005 14:47:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 94479 invoked by uid 500); 27 Sep 2005 14:47:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 94432 invoked by uid 500); 27 Sep 2005 14:47:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 94419 invoked by uid 99); 27 Sep 2005 14:47:02 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 07:47:02 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [82.195.144.76] (HELO loughan.stdlib.net) (82.195.144.76) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 07:47:08 -0700 Received: from colmmacc by loughan.stdlib.net with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EKGj9-0002eo-0i for dev@httpd.apache.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:46:39 +0100 Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:46:39 +0100 From: Colm MacCarthaigh To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: which apr(-util) versions for 2.2.x? Message-ID: <20050927144639.GA10186@stdlib.net> Reply-To: colm@stdlib.net References: <200509241204.45418@news.perlig.de> <433585B2.9070100@force-elite.com> <20050927134739.GE27268@redhat.com> <7389.196.8.104.27.1127831959.squirrel@www.sharp.fm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <7389.196.8.104.27.1127831959.squirrel@www.sharp.fm> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 04:39:19PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote: > Joe Orton said: > > > I think it would actually be sensible at this point to require > > apr/apr-util >= 1.2.0 across the board. > > +1. +1 I might be adding >= 1.3.0 dependencies to trunk soon too, in the form of configurable buffer sizes for various things. Though not planning to backport to 2.2., but it makes it less of a jump. -- Colm MacC�rthaigh Public Key: colm+pgp@stdlib.net