From dev-return-49087-apmail-httpd-dev-archive=httpd.apache.org@httpd.apache.org Mon Sep 05 17:24:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99879 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2005 17:24:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Sep 2005 17:24:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 31343 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2005 17:24:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 31315 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2005 17:24:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 31302 invoked by uid 99); 5 Sep 2005 17:24:08 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 10:24:08 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [209.133.192.6] (HELO devsys.jaguNET.com) (209.133.192.6) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 10:24:21 -0700 Received: (from jim@localhost) by devsys.jaguNET.com (8.11.7a/jag-2.6) id j85HO6B15725 for dev@httpd.apache.org; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 13:24:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Jagielski Message-Id: <200509051724.j85HO6B15725@devsys.jaguNET.com> Subject: Re: LoadModule questions on WIN32 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 13:24:02 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: jim@jaguNET.com In-Reply-To: from "Paul Querna" at Sep 05, 2005 09:04:58 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Paul Querna wrote: > > > IMO, this sure sounds like a bug in the way the WINNT MPM operates. I > believe it should be changed to match the same pattern as all the other > MPMs. > Agreed. I asked Bill Rowe to check out 2.1.7 and it passed the proxy_balancer test on his Win32 system, so I wonder if it is something generic at all? -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] jim@jaguNET.com [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "Sith happens" - Yoda