httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Querna <>
Subject Re: Issues for 2.1.8
Date Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:01:07 GMT
Mads Toftum wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 09:37:58PM +0100, Nick Kew wrote:
>> I agree about both of those.  And I'd say the same even more strongly for
>> mod_dbd, simply because it (or whatever it becomes when updated in the
>> light of real-life experience) should become the basis of a new generation
>> of applications.  If it's there, it'll start to permeate the Usual Suspects
>> like mod_perl.  If not, we'll still have the old situation of Perl, Python,
>> PHP, Tcl, Authentication, Logging etc each maintaining its own separate
>> database connections, and having to reinvent the connection pooling
>> wheel if they want to if they want to improve scalability.
> big +1 - let's not toss all the cool new features before the release and
> get into the same situation as 1.3 -> 2.0 having trouble convincing
> people that it was worth the upgrade.

So, lets change the VERSIONING file/policy.  Experimental Modules will 
be included in the stable branch. Majority Agree?


View raw message