Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of parin.soc@gmail.com designates
 64.233.162.205 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=pPdZeTRZi4IwVtGIZr3XFz1r0o9XkfBFnHa6eQm8CPuEpqMOReRwn8Er4eEjRN1srycNNSbzE6n2R+ydfxnurcnc/IY5w74XXiY7cum+wAS4LQV7cPxrFw/VRPUq8xjhbPitTy8O7VVfuWuuZ6DQIfzQfcDptRrsRuhHjcYcTRQ=
Message-ID: <e0f6a050050809221622cd3f9d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:16:33 -0500
From: Parin Shah <parin.soc@gmail.com>
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: how to make sub-requests?
In-Reply-To: <42F8CA9A.4020000@sharp.fm>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <e0f6a050050805220141e76787@mail.gmail.com>
	 <40891.196.8.104.31.1123496141.squirrel@www.sharp.fm>
	 <6.2.1.2.2.20050808054310.05353120@pop3.rowe-clan.net>
	 <e0f6a050050809065814968043@mail.gmail.com>
	 <42F8CA9A.4020000@sharp.fm>

> Would there be value in teaching ap_read_request() how to not break if
> you called ap_read_request(NULL)?
>=20
Well, I couldnt find a way to do this. and with NULL value it crashes.

> Alternatively ap_read_request() could be broken up into
> ap_read_request() and ap_create_request(), which would do just the
> request_req creation part.
>=20
request_rec creation part needs conn_rec, and creating conn_req is
again not straight forward  so I dont think ap_read_request is gonna
help us in this case.

> This seems to be the first time a request_req has ever been needed where
> a connection was not available.

I am now going through mod-proxy as chipig and iholsman suggested. It
seems that allows us to create fake requests. any further help in that
(or any other) direction would be really great.

Thanks,
Parin.
>=20
> Regards,
> Graham
> --
>