Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 46925 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2005 02:10:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Aug 2005 02:10:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 83769 invoked by uid 500); 31 Aug 2005 02:10:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 83667 invoked by uid 500); 31 Aug 2005 02:10:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 83654 invoked by uid 99); 31 Aug 2005 02:10:39 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 19:10:37 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [207.155.252.97] (HELO elephant.cnchost.com) (207.155.252.97) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 19:10:52 -0700 Received: from rcsv650.rowe-clan.net (c-24-13-128-132.hsd1.il.comcast.net [24.13.128.132]) by elephant.cnchost.com id WAA10408; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 22:10:34 -0400 (EDT) [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.17] Errors-To: Message-Id: <6.2.1.2.2.20050830205630.07020da0@pop3.rowe-clan.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.1.2 Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 20:56:46 -0500 To: dev@httpd.apache.org From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." Subject: Re: Status of 2.1.7 Cc: dev@httpd.apache.org In-Reply-To: <20050830214601.GB23711@stdlib.net> References: <4313E764.5040605@force-elite.com> <6.2.1.2.2.20050830161756.05e61980@pop3.rowe-clan.net> <20050830214601.GB23711@stdlib.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N At 04:46 PM 8/30/2005, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote: >Since Apachecon EU, it's also been running the worker MPM (on IA64). and >performance is up by around 9% in our benchmarks. In trunk's STATUS >there's a vote which seems have long since passed (positively) to make >worker the default MPM. > >Is this going to happen for 2.2 GA? IMHO, yes it should. Bill