Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 33204 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2005 07:22:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Aug 2005 07:22:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 18667 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2005 07:22:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 18644 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2005 07:22:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 18631 invoked by uid 99); 7 Aug 2005 07:22:27 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 00:22:27 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [207.155.248.14] (HELO marlborough.cnchost.com) (207.155.248.14) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 00:22:16 -0700 Received: from rcsv650.rowe-clan.net (c-24-13-128-132.hsd1.il.comcast.net [24.13.128.132]) by marlborough.cnchost.com id DAA08521; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 03:22:24 -0400 (EDT) [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.17] Errors-To: Message-Id: <6.2.1.2.2.20050807001908.05a1db80@pop3.rowe-clan.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.1.2 Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 02:22:11 -0500 To: dev@httpd.apache.org From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." Subject: Re: [SubPatches] httpd-2.0.54-proxy-request.patch Cc: dev@httpd.apache.org In-Reply-To: <6.2.1.2.2.20050806213837.0344c870@pop3.rowe-clan.net> References: <6.2.1.2.2.20050806213837.0344c870@pop3.rowe-clan.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N At 09:53 PM 8/6/2005, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > (don't set up else code blocks following an if case which > results in an absolute 'return', especially when we were > breaking 80-col limits left and right) Ignore... sorry, that referred to a bit of code that no longer is an issue.