Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
From: Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com>
Message-Id: <200508101622.j7AGMBD00495@devsys.jaguNET.com>
Subject: Re: proxy balancer rework
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:22:07 -0400 (EDT)
Reply-To: jim@jaguNET.com
In-Reply-To: <no.id> from "Mladen Turk" at Aug 10, 2005 06:02:31 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Mladen Turk wrote:
> 
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >> Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >>
> > 
> > I don't know what you mean...
> 
> Well, IMO if there is a need for a new balancer
> one should write a new balancer module.
> 

Not balancer. Method.

> Right now we have both API and functionality
> inside mod_proxy that enables one to do that.
> 
> If we start adding hooks to the balancer 'sub module'
> we'll end up with the module for the sub module :)
> 
> Anyhow, if someone wishes to write a specific
> load balancer module there is API for that, so
> I don't see why would we need another one.
> 

Did you even look at the patch? Your comments show
a supreme lack of understanding what it does.

-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
                     "Sith happens"  -  Yoda