httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Branko ─îibej <br...@xbc.nu>
Subject Re: 2.1/2.3
Date Thu, 11 Aug 2005 04:39:07 GMT
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

>At 10:17 AM 8/10/2005, Paul Querna wrote:
>  
>
>>Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>I must have missed it while away on vacation, but what is
>>>the criteria on what gets in 2.1.x and what gets in 2.3.x.
>>>Does this mean that for stuff to get in 2.2, it needs
>>>to go into 2.3.x (trunk) then get proposed for backport
>>>into 2.1/2.2?
>>>      
>>>
>>Don't mess with the 2.2 branch.  I will be re-branching it from trunk
>>once APR/APR-Util are sorted out and start their own releases.
>>    
>>
>
>I trust you mean re-sync and not re-branch?
>  
>
If by re-sync you mean what I think you mean, there's no practical 
difference between the two -- except that re-branching is easier to do. 
Unless the current 2.2 and trunk have diverged in incompatible ways, in 
which case there's something seriously wrong with the release process...

-- Brane


Mime
View raw message