httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: proxy balancer rework
Date Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:07:15 GMT
Mladen Turk wrote:
> 
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > 
> > I wasn't. It was simply that we appeared to be discussing
> > 2 different things.
> > 
> > Bet I'm older and more tired than you are ;)
> > 
> 
> Right. Ever visited Vukovar?

Got me there :)

> 
> Anyhow, I think that all balancer methods should be
> threated just like a protocols. If you have
> a new XXX protocol, you will need to add the XXX
> proxy protocol handler.
> 

I just feel that being able to add a 'byrandom' method,
for example, to suppliment bytraffic and byrequests should
be easy to do and not require code level changes to mod_proxy.c
or mod_proxy_balancer.c (and, of course, any headers).

-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
                     "Sith happens"  -  Yoda

Mime
View raw message