Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
From: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
Organization: WebThing Ltd
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: mod_smtpd design.
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 16:51:58 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
References: <42C4E643.10806@mit.edu>
 <1120232065.42c562813064e@webmail.mit.edu>
 <200507011647.33236.nick@webthing.com>
In-Reply-To: <200507011647.33236.nick@webthing.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200507011652.00622.nick@webthing.com>

On Friday 01 July 2005 16:47, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Friday 01 July 2005 16:34, Rian A Hunter wrote:
> > Quoting Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net>:
> > > Rian Hunter wrote:
> > > > type misc_smtp_handler(request_rec *r) {
> > > >     smtpd_request_rec *smtp_data;
> > > >
> > > >     if (strncmp("http", r->protocol_name, 4)) {
> > > >         // decline to handle, this module doesn't handle
> > > >         // http requests.
> > > >     }
> > > >     //then get smtpd specific data
> > > >     smtp_data = get_smtpd_request(r);
> > > >
> > > >     // do some handlin'
> > > > }
>
> This is an interesting line to consider for the longer term (if we can
> resolve the back-compatibility issue).  But it's far too big a disruption
> to contemplate for 2.1/2.2 or the SoC timeframe.

I think I just misread what you wrote.  It's not a big disruption at all,
and I take back what I just said.

-- 
Nick Kew