httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: [Patch 1.3] Strict proxy C-L / T-E conformance
Date Thu, 07 Jul 2005 17:11:50 GMT
Joe Orton wrote:
> 
> An empty string, right: I think it's certainly correct to treat that as 
> invalid C-L header;
> 

While we wait on Roy's response, my own PoV is that we should
accept it and assume it means '0', so be as lenient and forgiving
as possible in input ("be generous in input, rigorous in output").

But if Roy says it's invalid, then we need to do what's right :)

-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
                     "Sith happens"  -  Yoda

Mime
View raw message