Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 51671 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2005 14:55:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jun 2005 14:55:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 17571 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2005 14:55:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 17493 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2005 14:55:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 17480 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2005 14:55:33 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from sheffield.concentric.net (HELO sheffield.cnchost.com) (207.155.252.12) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 07:55:31 -0700 Received: from rcsv650.rowe-clan.net (c-24-13-128-132.hsd1.il.comcast.net [24.13.128.132]) by sheffield.cnchost.com id KAA16772; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 10:55:15 -0400 (EDT) [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.17] Errors-To: Message-Id: <6.2.1.2.2.20050616094736.0848eeb0@pop3.rowe-clan.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.1.2 Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 09:52:47 -0500 To: dev@httpd.apache.org From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." Subject: Re: HTTPD 2.1 (Head) Build issues for NetWare... Cc: , In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N At 09:43 AM 6/16/2005, Brad Nicholes wrote: > I have run into this one also and I still don't understand why the make is all of the sudden asking for yacc when this all worked before. Since neither mod_ssl nor BSD sockets are part of the standard NetWare build, this isn't a show stopper. But I would like to understand what happened and how to fix it. If I had to guess; * The most recent tarballs have been pulled together with SVN's absolutely bogus default of [miscellany] use-commit-times = no (see your ~/.svn/config, where you can uncomment this section and option). This means they are checkout dates, which are entirely useless. It means any dependencies that WOULD be resolved by our commit order are no longer resolved and force rebuilds. * There was an extra 'touch' to the datestamps for these files at one time; this may not have occurred in the last package. * Depending on the tool used to unpack the source tarball, that tool might not be date preserving; this would invalidate anything we attempted above to prevent rebuilding these targets.