Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 75009 invoked from network); 2 May 2005 19:26:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 May 2005 19:26:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 72553 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2005 19:27:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 72480 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2005 19:27:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 72337 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2005 19:27:52 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from jimsys.jaguNET.com (HELO jimsys.jaguNET.com) (209.133.199.10) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2005 12:27:52 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jimsys.jaguNET.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8D64E35BF for ; Mon, 2 May 2005 15:26:20 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) In-Reply-To: <4272B8FF.5000805@force-elite.com> References: <4272B8FF.5000805@force-elite.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <5aeba7922858bd9cfd5ee0055d7a2cc7@jaguNET.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jim Jagielski Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Branch 2.1.x on May 13 Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 15:26:19 -0400 To: dev@httpd.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622) X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I'm +1 for branching 2.2-alpha... However, there are 2 outstanding show-stoppers. Do we expect these to be addressed before the branch. I think so, especially if they require API changes