httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Branch 2.1.x on May 13
Date Mon, 02 May 2005 19:38:48 GMT
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> 
> --On Monday, May 2, 2005 3:33 PM -0400 Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> > I thought the whole idea about having a 2.1 dev version was to avoid
> > monkeying around with the API and the problems when we were doing
> > 1.3 and 2.0. Once we branch, it is possible that we'll run into
> > issues that may require a bump, but I think entering into a 2.2
> > tree "expecting" one may not be prudent. And it's only the
> > 2nd showstopper which could be considered "valid" enough to
> > delay the branch.
> 
> Paul proposed branching 2.1.x not 2.2.x.  -- justin
> 

Ahh yes. +1 then.

-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
    "There 10 types of people: those who read binary and everyone else."

Mime
View raw message