Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 52138 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2005 14:17:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Apr 2005 14:17:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 18853 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2005 14:17:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 18784 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2005 14:17:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 18737 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2005 14:17:02 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from i.meepzor.com (HELO Boron.MeepZor.Com) (204.146.167.214) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 07:16:46 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (dmz-firewall [206.199.198.4]) by Boron.MeepZor.Com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j3CEGY6p006575 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 10:16:35 -0400 Message-ID: <425BD847.1080606@wstoddard.com> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 10:16:39 -0400 From: Bill Stoddard User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: 2.0.54 release candidate tarball available for testing References: <425B77E2.8000604@apache.org> <6.2.1.2.2.20050412085141.05c0cc50@pop3.rowe-clan.net> In-Reply-To: <6.2.1.2.2.20050412085141.05c0cc50@pop3.rowe-clan.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > At 02:25 AM 4/12/2005, Sander Striker wrote: > > >>As usual the tarballs are at: >> >>http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ >> >>Please give 2.0.54 a whirl and report any problems (or successes) ;) > > > Hmmm. How does the current infrastructure state of http://*.apache.org > fit into testing this live for our site? Is it possible to subject > ourselves to the usual three days of our own dogfood? +1 Bill