Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 26212 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2005 01:51:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Apr 2005 01:51:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 5261 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2005 01:51:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 5235 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2005 01:51:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 5222 invoked by uid 99); 10 Apr 2005 01:51:19 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from force-elite.com (HELO utopia.in.force-elite.com) (216.255.199.145) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 18:51:18 -0700 X-AuthUser: chip@force-elite.com Received: from [10.0.0.142] (10.0.0.142:57566) by utopia.in.force-elite.com with [XMail 1.17 (Linux/Ix86) ESMTP Server] id for from ; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 18:51:14 -0700 Message-ID: <42588692.9070904@force-elite.com> Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 18:51:14 -0700 From: Paul Querna User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r160645 - httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS References: <20050409003846.53395.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> <42586C62.5060400@apache.org> <425872A8.5010406@force-elite.com> In-Reply-To: <425872A8.5010406@force-elite.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Paul Querna wrote: > Sander Striker wrote: > >> Paul, Justin, could you either provide me with a complete patch >> against 2.0.x >> or add the revisions I need to merge? >> > > I am backporting mod_version right now. > Okay, I was backporting this, but ran into a few problems. First, it requires a minor MMN bump to add the version API stuff. Thats not too bad, and I was making a patch for all of it. The biggest problem is that my working copy in subversion broke. 'svn diff' just doesn't work right (added files are not shown). I opened a bug report on it: http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2270 I am ready to give up on mod_version for 2.0.54.... unless someone else is feeling lucky.. -Paul