Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of jorton@redhat.com designates
 66.187.233.31 as permitted sender)
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 17:41:10 +0100
From: Joe Orton <jorton@redhat.com>
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Who owns a passed brigade?
Message-ID: <20050425164110.GA28993@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
References: <4268036B.1010903@force-elite.com>
 <Pine.GSO.4.58.0504211654530.21245@cobra.cs.Virginia.EDU>
 <Pine.GSO.4.58.0504211714010.21245@cobra.cs.Virginia.EDU>
 <3a685e2a385a150260b0620cd1ad1b8a@ricilake.net>
 <42682E78.2070704@webthing.com>
 <14d90ae688a5482f5a7b6abeffb8f5a6@ricilake.net>
 <20050422143217.GA6470@redhat.com>
 <aafc16e34e11bea58c593174dba8dac4@ricilake.net>
 <20050425132946.GC22792@redhat.com>
 <Pine.GSO.4.58.0504251113540.13315@cobra.cs.Virginia.EDU>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0504251113540.13315@cobra.cs.Virginia.EDU>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:15:02AM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Joe Orton wrote:
> 
> > 1. update the util_filter.h documentation
> > 2. add some APR_BUCKET_DEBUG code to abort() when brigades are used
> > after being "destroyed"
> > 3. adjust all filters to work with this model
> > 4. switch to allocate brigades out of the bucket allocator
> 
> Didn't we try #4 before and "something bad" happened?  I don't remember
> what that would have been, I just feel certain #4 has been previously
> discussed at least.

What I tried last year was doing #4 without doing #3 first, and that
indeed did not not work.

joe