Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-46759-apmail-httpd-dev-archive=httpd.apache.org@httpd.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 41398 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2005 18:41:45 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2005 18:41:45 -0000
Received: (qmail 10799 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2005 18:41:38 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 10774 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2005 18:41:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@httpd.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@httpd.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 10761 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2005 18:41:38 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from radu.onastick.net (HELO radu.onastick.net) (207.44.150.54)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 11:41:36 -0700
Received: from sitz by radu.onastick.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1DIA2R-0007l6-00
	for <dev@httpd.apache.org>; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 14:41:35 -0400
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 14:41:35 -0400
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Do these broken clients still exist?
Message-ID: <20050403184135.GA23372@radu.onastick.net>
References: <Pine.WNT.4.61.0504031355260.1504@bronfman504>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.61.0504031355260.1504@bronfman504>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: Noah <sitz@onastick.net>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 01:58:56PM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
> Does someone with a high-traffic, general-interest web site want to take a 
> look through their logs for these user-agent strings.  I don't mind 
> keeping them if they make up even 1/100 of a percent of the trafic, but it 
> seems silly to keep these extra regexes on every single request if these 
> clients don't exist anymore in the wild.

[snip]
>     BrowserMatch "Mozilla/2" nokeepalive

I still see this; .001% of ~2M requests from the following full UA
strings:

Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; Ask Jeeves/Teoma; +http://sp.ask.com/docs/about/tech_crawling.html)"
Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; MS FrontPage 4.0)"
Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; MS FrontPage 5.0)"
Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; MSIE 3.02; Update a; AK; Windows 95)"
Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; MSIE 3.02; Windows 95)"
Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; MSIE 3.02; Windows CE)"
Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; MSIE 3.02; Windows CE; PPC; 240x320) BlackBerry7100/4.0.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1"
Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; MSIE 3.02; Windows CE; PPC; 240x320)"
Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; MSIE 3.0; Windows 95)"
Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; MSIE 3.0b; AOL 4.0; Windows 3.1)"

--n

-- 
<huey> dd of=/dev/fd0 if=/dev/flippy bs=1024
<huey> ^^^ Making Flippy Floppy