| P. Asokan |
Posix mutex in apache modue |
Fri, 11 Mar, 15:21 |
| Paul Querna |
Re: Posix mutex in apache modue |
Fri, 11 Mar, 16:43 |
| Alexander Lazic |
HTTP 1.1 Pipling Requests |
Fri, 11 Mar, 17:58 |
| Joe Schaefer |
[PATCH] remove str* overrides |
Fri, 11 Mar, 21:44 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: [PATCH] remove str* overrides |
Fri, 11 Mar, 23:08 |
| André Malo |
Re: [PATCH] remove str* overrides |
Sat, 12 Mar, 10:10 |
| Joe Schaefer |
Re: [PATCH] remove str* overrides |
Sat, 12 Mar, 15:39 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: [PATCH] remove str* overrides |
Sun, 13 Mar, 00:34 |
| André Malo |
Re: [PATCH] remove str* overrides |
Sun, 13 Mar, 06:27 |
| Jason Rigby |
Mod_SSL in binaries |
Sat, 12 Mar, 00:52 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: Mod_SSL in binaries |
Sat, 12 Mar, 02:08 |
| Graham Leggett |
Re: Mod_SSL in binaries |
Sat, 12 Mar, 02:20 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: Mod_SSL in binaries |
Sat, 12 Mar, 04:39 |
| Graham Leggett |
Re: Mod_SSL in binaries |
Sat, 12 Mar, 13:47 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: Mod_SSL in binaries |
Sun, 13 Mar, 00:36 |
|
Re: APR OS400 sources |
|
| Jeff Trawick |
Re: APR OS400 sources |
Mon, 14 Mar, 19:00 |
| apache-...@dslr.net |
httpd-2.1.3-beta under a large DDOS attack ... not good. |
Mon, 14 Mar, 21:21 |
| Paul Querna |
Re: httpd-2.1.3-beta under a large DDOS attack ... not good. |
Mon, 14 Mar, 22:21 |
| justin |
Re[2]: httpd-2.1.3-beta under a large DDOS attack ... not good. |
Mon, 14 Mar, 22:30 |
| justin |
Re[2]: httpd-2.1.3-beta under a large DDOS attack ... not good. |
Mon, 14 Mar, 22:36 |
| Greg Ames |
Re: httpd-2.1.3-beta under a large DDOS attack ... not good. |
Tue, 15 Mar, 14:58 |
| Greg Ames |
[PATCH] subrequests don't inherit bodies |
Mon, 14 Mar, 21:47 |
| Joe Schaefer |
Re: [PATCH] subrequests don't inherit bodies |
Mon, 14 Mar, 22:19 |
| Bill Stoddard |
Subrequests should not inherit entity-header fields from the mainline request |
Wed, 16 Mar, 16:30 |
| Paul Querna |
Re: Subrequests should not inherit entity-header fields from the mainline request |
Wed, 16 Mar, 16:52 |
| Joe Schaefer |
Re: Subrequests should not inherit entity-header fields from the mainline request |
Wed, 16 Mar, 17:25 |
| Greg Ames |
Re: Subrequests should not inherit entity-header fields from the mainline request |
Tue, 29 Mar, 18:31 |
| Greg Ames |
Re: Subrequests should not inherit entity-header fields from the mainline request |
Tue, 29 Mar, 18:27 |
| Jie Gao |
feature proposal |
Tue, 15 Mar, 02:25 |
| Joshua Slive |
Re: feature proposal |
Tue, 15 Mar, 03:20 |
| Jie Gao |
Re: feature proposal |
Tue, 15 Mar, 03:59 |
| Dirk-Willem van Gulik |
Re: feature proposal |
Tue, 15 Mar, 09:30 |
| Joshua Slive |
Re: feature proposal |
Tue, 15 Mar, 13:48 |
| Jie Gao |
Re: feature proposal |
Tue, 15 Mar, 21:43 |
| Paul Querna |
Rolling 2.1.4... |
Tue, 15 Mar, 04:03 |
| Sander Striker |
Re: Rolling 2.1.4... |
Tue, 15 Mar, 08:02 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: Rolling 2.1.4... |
Tue, 15 Mar, 08:13 |
| Sander Striker |
Re: Rolling 2.1.4... |
Tue, 15 Mar, 09:16 |
| Sander Striker |
Re: Rolling 2.1.4... |
Wed, 16 Mar, 10:14 |
|
Apache1.3.X on Solaris 10 - Any known issues ? |
|
| Hassan shaik |
Apache1.3.X on Solaris 10 - Any known issues ? |
Tue, 15 Mar, 07:44 |
| Paul Querna |
Re: Apache1.3.X on Solaris 10 - Any known issues ? |
Tue, 15 Mar, 21:20 |
| Eric Covener |
[PATCH] ReceiveBufferSize directive for large POST |
Tue, 15 Mar, 19:52 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: [PATCH] ReceiveBufferSize directive for large POST |
Tue, 15 Mar, 20:05 |
| Sander Striker |
2.1.4 available for testing |
Wed, 16 Mar, 21:00 |
| Paul Querna |
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing |
Wed, 16 Mar, 21:42 |
| Sander Striker |
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing |
Wed, 16 Mar, 21:50 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing |
Thu, 17 Mar, 00:11 |
| Graham Leggett |
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing |
Thu, 17 Mar, 00:40 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing |
Thu, 17 Mar, 00:50 |
| Brad Nicholes |
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing |
Thu, 17 Mar, 01:03 |
| Oden Eriksson |
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing |
Thu, 17 Mar, 05:47 |
| Paul Querna |
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing |
Thu, 17 Mar, 05:52 |
| Paul Querna |
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing |
Thu, 17 Mar, 05:53 |
| Oden Eriksson |
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing |
Thu, 17 Mar, 06:33 |
| Graham Leggett |
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing |
Sun, 20 Mar, 12:44 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing |
Mon, 21 Mar, 22:25 |
| Graham Leggett |
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing |
Tue, 22 Mar, 09:39 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing |
Tue, 22 Mar, 23:58 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing |
Thu, 17 Mar, 23:37 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing |
Fri, 18 Mar, 04:16 |
| Rodent of Unusual Size |
[STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Mar 16 23:46:03 2005 |
Thu, 17 Mar, 04:46 |
| Rodent of Unusual Size |
[STATUS] (httpd-2.1) Wed Mar 16 23:46:20 2005 |
Thu, 17 Mar, 04:46 |
| Jeff Trawick |
do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Thu, 17 Mar, 12:57 |
| Joshua Slive |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Thu, 17 Mar, 13:47 |
| Colm MacCarthaigh |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Thu, 17 Mar, 14:12 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Thu, 17 Mar, 15:27 |
| Jim Jagielski |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Thu, 17 Mar, 15:30 |
| Jeff Trawick |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Thu, 17 Mar, 15:57 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Thu, 17 Mar, 19:33 |
| Jeff Trawick |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Thu, 17 Mar, 20:18 |
| Brian Akins |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 15:02 |
| Joshua Slive |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Thu, 17 Mar, 15:59 |
| Colm MacCarthaigh |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Thu, 17 Mar, 17:37 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 01:21 |
| Jeff Trawick |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 00:01 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 01:33 |
| Jeff Trawick |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 10:59 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 16:07 |
| Ryan Bloom |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 16:12 |
| Cliff Woolley |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 16:16 |
| Bill Stoddard |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 16:20 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 16:23 |
| Colm MacCarthaigh |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 16:34 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 17:00 |
| Colm MacCarthaigh |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 17:18 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 18:34 |
| Brian Akins |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 19:01 |
| Colm MacCarthaigh |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 19:44 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 19:51 |
| Colm MacCarthaigh |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 20:04 |
| Greg Marr |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 16:41 |
| Ryan Bloom |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 16:27 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 17:00 |
| Jim Jagielski |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 17:03 |
| Brian Akins |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 19:15 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 20:11 |
| Jeff Trawick |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 16:51 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 16:59 |
| Jeff Trawick |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 17:20 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 18:02 |
| Jeff Trawick |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 16:53 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 17:05 |
| Jeff Trawick |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 17:53 |
| Bill Stoddard |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Thu, 17 Mar, 16:12 |
| Joshua Slive |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Thu, 17 Mar, 16:15 |
| Bill Stoddard |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Thu, 17 Mar, 16:23 |
| Rici Lake |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Thu, 17 Mar, 16:48 |
| Rici Lake |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Thu, 17 Mar, 17:22 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 01:34 |
| Eric Covener |
[2.0 PATCH] ReceiveBufferSize directive for large POST |
Thu, 17 Mar, 20:04 |
| Eric Covener |
[1.3 PATCH] ReceiveBufferSize directive for large POST |
Thu, 17 Mar, 20:18 |
| Jim Jagielski |
Re: [1.3 PATCH] ReceiveBufferSize directive for large POST |
Thu, 17 Mar, 21:47 |
| Edward Rudd |
why are ipv4 address being mapped as ipv6? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 02:39 |
| Colm MacCarthaigh |
Re: why are ipv4 address being mapped as ipv6? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 09:24 |
| Edward Rudd |
Re: why are ipv4 address being mapped as ipv6? |
Sat, 19 Mar, 05:26 |
| Matthew Hagerty |
Log entries larger than PIPE_BUF may interleave? |
Fri, 18 Mar, 04:50 |
| Paul Querna |
mod_coredumper |
Fri, 18 Mar, 07:46 |
| Maxime Zakharov |
Re: mod_coredumper |
Fri, 18 Mar, 09:33 |
| Paul Querna |
Re: mod_coredumper |
Fri, 18 Mar, 15:37 |
| Daniel Freedman |
Apache2 troubles with shmcb SSLSessionCache... |
Fri, 18 Mar, 17:12 |
| Joe Orton |
Re: Apache2 troubles with shmcb SSLSessionCache... |
Mon, 21 Mar, 15:01 |
| Daniel Freedman |
Re: Apache2 troubles with shmcb SSLSessionCache... |
Fri, 25 Mar, 03:09 |
| NormW |
ap_mmn.h Update |
Sat, 19 Mar, 22:18 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: ap_mmn.h Update |
Tue, 22 Mar, 04:00 |
| NormW |
Re: ap_mmn.h Update |
Wed, 23 Mar, 02:49 |
|
Re: svn commit: r158303 - httpd/httpd/trunk/buildconf |
|
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: svn commit: r158303 - httpd/httpd/trunk/buildconf |
Mon, 21 Mar, 23:19 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: svn commit: r158303 - httpd/httpd/trunk/buildconf |
Tue, 22 Mar, 00:38 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: svn commit: r158303 - httpd/httpd/trunk/buildconf |
Tue, 22 Mar, 17:33 |
| Sander Striker |
Re: svn commit: r158303 - httpd/httpd/trunk/buildconf |
Tue, 22 Mar, 04:58 |
| Paul Querna |
Re: svn commit: r158303 - httpd/httpd/trunk/buildconf |
Tue, 22 Mar, 05:11 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: svn commit: r158303 - httpd/httpd/trunk/buildconf |
Tue, 22 Mar, 21:22 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: svn commit: r158303 - httpd/httpd/trunk/buildconf |
Tue, 22 Mar, 22:02 |
| Sander Striker |
buildconf.nice, WAS: Re: svn commit: r158303 - httpd/httpd/trunk/buildconf |
Tue, 22 Mar, 22:20 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: svn commit: r158303 - httpd/httpd/trunk/buildconf |
Wed, 23 Mar, 00:02 |
| Nathanael Noblet |
Http/APR |
Tue, 22 Mar, 03:44 |
| Cliff Woolley |
Re: Http/APR |
Tue, 22 Mar, 05:07 |
| Rici Lake |
Re: svn commit: r125465 httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ldap/util_ldap.c |
Tue, 22 Mar, 05:12 |
| Paul Querna |
Re: svn commit: r125465 httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ldap/util_ldap.c |
Tue, 22 Mar, 21:29 |
| Graham Leggett |
Re: svn commit: r125465 httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ldap/util_ldap.c |
Tue, 22 Mar, 22:17 |
| Rici Lake |
Re: svn commit: r125465 httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ldap/util_ldap.c |
Tue, 22 Mar, 23:02 |
| Graham Leggett |
Re: svn commit: r125465 httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ldap/util_ldap.c |
Tue, 22 Mar, 23:33 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: svn commit: r125465 httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ldap/util_ldap.c |
Wed, 23 Mar, 00:04 |
| Henri Schomäcker |
no results with apr_env_get |
Tue, 22 Mar, 12:08 |
| Jeff Trawick |
Re: no results with apr_env_get |
Tue, 22 Mar, 15:56 |
| Henri Gomez |
iSeries Apache 2.0.x - where is ap_mpm_query equivalent ? |
Tue, 22 Mar, 14:19 |
| Henri Gomez |
Re: iSeries Apache 2.0.x - where is ap_mpm_query equivalent ? |
Wed, 23 Mar, 08:45 |
|
Re: svn commit: r157948 - in httpd/httpd/trunk/srclib/pcre: pcre.c study.c |
|
| Joe Orton |
Re: svn commit: r157948 - in httpd/httpd/trunk/srclib/pcre: pcre.c study.c |
Tue, 22 Mar, 15:44 |
| Rici Lake |
util_ldap.c redux |
Tue, 22 Mar, 23:52 |
| Sergey Velikanov [UzPAK] |
gprof and apache |
Wed, 23 Mar, 11:17 |
| Brian Akins |
"Supported" Compilers |
Wed, 23 Mar, 17:11 |
| TOKI...@aol.com |
Re: "Supported" Compilers |
Wed, 23 Mar, 12:52 |
| André Malo |
Re: "Supported" Compilers |
Wed, 23 Mar, 17:21 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: "Supported" Compilers |
Wed, 23 Mar, 17:49 |
| Rodent of Unusual Size |
[STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Mar 23 23:45:24 2005 |
Thu, 24 Mar, 04:45 |
| Rodent of Unusual Size |
[STATUS] (httpd-2.1) Wed Mar 23 23:45:33 2005 |
Thu, 24 Mar, 04:45 |
| Jens Stutte |
Enhancement of =?utf-8?b?bW9kX2NoYXJzZXRfbGl0ZQ==?= |
Thu, 24 Mar, 11:47 |
|
Backport of AllowEncodedSlashes to Apache 1.3 |
|
| Aaron Bannert |
Backport of AllowEncodedSlashes to Apache 1.3 |
Fri, 25 Mar, 00:38 |
| Aaron Bannert |
Re: Backport of AllowEncodedSlashes to Apache 1.3 |
Tue, 29 Mar, 16:43 |
| Jim Jagielski |
Re: Backport of AllowEncodedSlashes to Apache 1.3 |
Tue, 29 Mar, 16:47 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: Backport of AllowEncodedSlashes to Apache 1.3 |
Tue, 29 Mar, 21:08 |
| Aaron Bannert |
Re: Backport of AllowEncodedSlashes to Apache 1.3 |
Wed, 30 Mar, 00:28 |
| Jim Jagielski |
Re: Backport of AllowEncodedSlashes to Apache 1.3 |
Tue, 29 Mar, 22:56 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: Backport of AllowEncodedSlashes to Apache 1.3 |
Tue, 29 Mar, 23:46 |
| Aaron Bannert |
Re: Backport of AllowEncodedSlashes to Apache 1.3 |
Wed, 30 Mar, 00:27 |
| Jim Jagielski |
Re: Backport of AllowEncodedSlashes to Apache 1.3 |
Wed, 30 Mar, 13:13 |
| Marco Schinkel |
Bind mod_proxy to a specific ip address for outgoing requests |
Fri, 25 Mar, 21:18 |
| Alexander Lazic |
2.1 trunk => ab -v 2 segfault |
Sat, 26 Mar, 10:27 |
| Michal Mertl |
problems with mod_proxy and mod_cache on 2.X |
Sat, 26 Mar, 15:03 |
| Michal Mertl |
Re: problems with mod_proxy and mod_cache on 2.X |
Sat, 26 Mar, 15:16 |
| Graham Leggett |
Re: problems with mod_proxy and mod_cache on 2.X |
Sun, 27 Mar, 15:28 |
| Michal Mertl |
Re: problems with mod_proxy and mod_cache on 2.X |
Mon, 28 Mar, 15:04 |
| Graham Leggett |
Re: problems with mod_proxy and mod_cache on 2.X |
Sun, 27 Mar, 15:24 |
| Michal Mertl |
Re: problems with mod_proxy and mod_cache on 2.X |
Mon, 28 Mar, 14:58 |
| Sander Striker |
Time for 2.0.54? |
Tue, 29 Mar, 00:46 |
|
Re: svn commit: r159356 - httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES |
|
| Paul Querna |
Re: svn commit: r159356 - httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES |
Tue, 29 Mar, 08:50 |
| Jeff Trawick |
Re: svn commit: r159356 - httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES |
Tue, 29 Mar, 11:12 |
| Bill Stoddard |
Re: svn commit: r159356 - httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES |
Tue, 29 Mar, 13:24 |