httpd-dev mailing list archives: March 2005

Site index · List index
Message list« Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
P. Asokan Posix mutex in apache modue Fri, 11 Mar, 15:21
Paul Querna   Re: Posix mutex in apache modue Fri, 11 Mar, 16:43
Alexander Lazic HTTP 1.1 Pipling Requests Fri, 11 Mar, 17:58
Joe Schaefer [PATCH] remove str* overrides Fri, 11 Mar, 21:44
William A. Rowe, Jr.   Re: [PATCH] remove str* overrides Fri, 11 Mar, 23:08
André Malo   Re: [PATCH] remove str* overrides Sat, 12 Mar, 10:10
Joe Schaefer     Re: [PATCH] remove str* overrides Sat, 12 Mar, 15:39
William A. Rowe, Jr.     Re: [PATCH] remove str* overrides Sun, 13 Mar, 00:34
André Malo       Re: [PATCH] remove str* overrides Sun, 13 Mar, 06:27
Jason Rigby Mod_SSL in binaries Sat, 12 Mar, 00:52
William A. Rowe, Jr.   Re: Mod_SSL in binaries Sat, 12 Mar, 02:08
Graham Leggett     Re: Mod_SSL in binaries Sat, 12 Mar, 02:20
William A. Rowe, Jr.       Re: Mod_SSL in binaries Sat, 12 Mar, 04:39
Graham Leggett         Re: Mod_SSL in binaries Sat, 12 Mar, 13:47
William A. Rowe, Jr.           Re: Mod_SSL in binaries Sun, 13 Mar, 00:36
Re: APR OS400 sources
Jeff Trawick   Re: APR OS400 sources Mon, 14 Mar, 19:00
apache-...@dslr.net httpd-2.1.3-beta under a large DDOS attack ... not good. Mon, 14 Mar, 21:21
Paul Querna   Re: httpd-2.1.3-beta under a large DDOS attack ... not good. Mon, 14 Mar, 22:21
justin     Re[2]: httpd-2.1.3-beta under a large DDOS attack ... not good. Mon, 14 Mar, 22:30
justin     Re[2]: httpd-2.1.3-beta under a large DDOS attack ... not good. Mon, 14 Mar, 22:36
Greg Ames     Re: httpd-2.1.3-beta under a large DDOS attack ... not good. Tue, 15 Mar, 14:58
Greg Ames [PATCH] subrequests don't inherit bodies Mon, 14 Mar, 21:47
Joe Schaefer   Re: [PATCH] subrequests don't inherit bodies Mon, 14 Mar, 22:19
Bill Stoddard     Subrequests should not inherit entity-header fields from the mainline request Wed, 16 Mar, 16:30
Paul Querna       Re: Subrequests should not inherit entity-header fields from the mainline request Wed, 16 Mar, 16:52
Joe Schaefer         Re: Subrequests should not inherit entity-header fields from the mainline request Wed, 16 Mar, 17:25
Greg Ames         Re: Subrequests should not inherit entity-header fields from the mainline request Tue, 29 Mar, 18:31
Greg Ames       Re: Subrequests should not inherit entity-header fields from the mainline request Tue, 29 Mar, 18:27
Jie Gao feature proposal Tue, 15 Mar, 02:25
Joshua Slive   Re: feature proposal Tue, 15 Mar, 03:20
Jie Gao     Re: feature proposal Tue, 15 Mar, 03:59
Dirk-Willem van Gulik       Re: feature proposal Tue, 15 Mar, 09:30
Joshua Slive       Re: feature proposal Tue, 15 Mar, 13:48
Jie Gao         Re: feature proposal Tue, 15 Mar, 21:43
Paul Querna Rolling 2.1.4... Tue, 15 Mar, 04:03
Sander Striker   Re: Rolling 2.1.4... Tue, 15 Mar, 08:02
Justin Erenkrantz   Re: Rolling 2.1.4... Tue, 15 Mar, 08:13
Sander Striker     Re: Rolling 2.1.4... Tue, 15 Mar, 09:16
Sander Striker       Re: Rolling 2.1.4... Wed, 16 Mar, 10:14
Apache1.3.X on Solaris 10 - Any known issues ?
Hassan shaik   Apache1.3.X on Solaris 10 - Any known issues ? Tue, 15 Mar, 07:44
Paul Querna     Re: Apache1.3.X on Solaris 10 - Any known issues ? Tue, 15 Mar, 21:20
Eric Covener [PATCH] ReceiveBufferSize directive for large POST Tue, 15 Mar, 19:52
Justin Erenkrantz   Re: [PATCH] ReceiveBufferSize directive for large POST Tue, 15 Mar, 20:05
Sander Striker 2.1.4 available for testing Wed, 16 Mar, 21:00
Paul Querna   Re: 2.1.4 available for testing Wed, 16 Mar, 21:42
Sander Striker   Re: 2.1.4 available for testing Wed, 16 Mar, 21:50
Justin Erenkrantz   Re: 2.1.4 available for testing Thu, 17 Mar, 00:11
Graham Leggett   Re: 2.1.4 available for testing Thu, 17 Mar, 00:40
William A. Rowe, Jr.   Re: 2.1.4 available for testing Thu, 17 Mar, 00:50
Brad Nicholes   Re: 2.1.4 available for testing Thu, 17 Mar, 01:03
Oden Eriksson   Re: 2.1.4 available for testing Thu, 17 Mar, 05:47
Paul Querna     Re: 2.1.4 available for testing Thu, 17 Mar, 05:52
Paul Querna       Re: 2.1.4 available for testing Thu, 17 Mar, 05:53
Oden Eriksson       Re: 2.1.4 available for testing Thu, 17 Mar, 06:33
Graham Leggett         Re: 2.1.4 available for testing Sun, 20 Mar, 12:44
William A. Rowe, Jr.           Re: 2.1.4 available for testing Mon, 21 Mar, 22:25
Graham Leggett             Re: 2.1.4 available for testing Tue, 22 Mar, 09:39
William A. Rowe, Jr.               Re: 2.1.4 available for testing Tue, 22 Mar, 23:58
William A. Rowe, Jr.   Re: 2.1.4 available for testing Thu, 17 Mar, 23:37
Justin Erenkrantz     Re: 2.1.4 available for testing Fri, 18 Mar, 04:16
Rodent of Unusual Size [STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Mar 16 23:46:03 2005 Thu, 17 Mar, 04:46
Rodent of Unusual Size [STATUS] (httpd-2.1) Wed Mar 16 23:46:20 2005 Thu, 17 Mar, 04:46
Jeff Trawick do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Thu, 17 Mar, 12:57
Joshua Slive   Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Thu, 17 Mar, 13:47
Colm MacCarthaigh     Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Thu, 17 Mar, 14:12
Justin Erenkrantz       Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Thu, 17 Mar, 15:27
Jim Jagielski         Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Thu, 17 Mar, 15:30
Jeff Trawick           Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Thu, 17 Mar, 15:57
William A. Rowe, Jr.             Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Thu, 17 Mar, 19:33
Jeff Trawick               Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Thu, 17 Mar, 20:18
Brian Akins               Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Fri, 18 Mar, 15:02
Joshua Slive         Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Thu, 17 Mar, 15:59
Colm MacCarthaigh         Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Thu, 17 Mar, 17:37
Justin Erenkrantz           Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Fri, 18 Mar, 01:21
Jeff Trawick         Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Fri, 18 Mar, 00:01
Justin Erenkrantz           Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Fri, 18 Mar, 01:33
Jeff Trawick             Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Fri, 18 Mar, 10:59
Justin Erenkrantz               Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Fri, 18 Mar, 16:07
Ryan Bloom               Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Fri, 18 Mar, 16:12
Cliff Woolley                 Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Fri, 18 Mar, 16:16
Bill Stoddard                   Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Fri, 18 Mar, 16:20
Justin Erenkrantz                 Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Fri, 18 Mar, 16:23
Colm MacCarthaigh                   Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Fri, 18 Mar, 16:34
Justin Erenkrantz                     Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Fri, 18 Mar, 17:00
Colm MacCarthaigh                       Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Fri, 18 Mar, 17:18
Justin Erenkrantz                         Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Fri, 18 Mar, 18:34
Brian Akins                           Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Fri, 18 Mar, 19:01
Colm MacCarthaigh                           Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Fri, 18 Mar, 19:44
Justin Erenkrantz                             Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Fri, 18 Mar, 19:51
Colm MacCarthaigh                               Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Fri, 18 Mar, 20:04
Greg Marr                   Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Fri, 18 Mar, 16:41
Ryan Bloom                 Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Fri, 18 Mar, 16:27
Justin Erenkrantz                   Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Fri, 18 Mar, 17:00
Jim Jagielski                     Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Fri, 18 Mar, 17:03
Brian Akins                       Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Fri, 18 Mar, 19:15
William A. Rowe, Jr.                       Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Fri, 18 Mar, 20:11
Jeff Trawick                 Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Fri, 18 Mar, 16:51
Justin Erenkrantz                   Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Fri, 18 Mar, 16:59
Jeff Trawick                   Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Fri, 18 Mar, 17:20
Justin Erenkrantz                     Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Fri, 18 Mar, 18:02
Jeff Trawick               Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Fri, 18 Mar, 16:53
Justin Erenkrantz                 Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Fri, 18 Mar, 17:05
Jeff Trawick                 Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Fri, 18 Mar, 17:53
Bill Stoddard     Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Thu, 17 Mar, 16:12
Joshua Slive       Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Thu, 17 Mar, 16:15
Bill Stoddard         Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Thu, 17 Mar, 16:23
Rici Lake       Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Thu, 17 Mar, 16:48
Rici Lake         Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Thu, 17 Mar, 17:22
William A. Rowe, Jr.         Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? Fri, 18 Mar, 01:34
Eric Covener [2.0 PATCH] ReceiveBufferSize directive for large POST Thu, 17 Mar, 20:04
Eric Covener [1.3 PATCH] ReceiveBufferSize directive for large POST Thu, 17 Mar, 20:18
Jim Jagielski   Re: [1.3 PATCH] ReceiveBufferSize directive for large POST Thu, 17 Mar, 21:47
Edward Rudd why are ipv4 address being mapped as ipv6? Fri, 18 Mar, 02:39
Colm MacCarthaigh   Re: why are ipv4 address being mapped as ipv6? Fri, 18 Mar, 09:24
Edward Rudd   Re: why are ipv4 address being mapped as ipv6? Sat, 19 Mar, 05:26
Matthew Hagerty Log entries larger than PIPE_BUF may interleave? Fri, 18 Mar, 04:50
Paul Querna mod_coredumper Fri, 18 Mar, 07:46
Maxime Zakharov   Re: mod_coredumper Fri, 18 Mar, 09:33
Paul Querna     Re: mod_coredumper Fri, 18 Mar, 15:37
Daniel Freedman Apache2 troubles with shmcb SSLSessionCache... Fri, 18 Mar, 17:12
Joe Orton   Re: Apache2 troubles with shmcb SSLSessionCache... Mon, 21 Mar, 15:01
Daniel Freedman   Re: Apache2 troubles with shmcb SSLSessionCache... Fri, 25 Mar, 03:09
NormW ap_mmn.h Update Sat, 19 Mar, 22:18
William A. Rowe, Jr.   Re: ap_mmn.h Update Tue, 22 Mar, 04:00
NormW     Re: ap_mmn.h Update Wed, 23 Mar, 02:49
Re: svn commit: r158303 - httpd/httpd/trunk/buildconf
William A. Rowe, Jr.   Re: svn commit: r158303 - httpd/httpd/trunk/buildconf Mon, 21 Mar, 23:19
Justin Erenkrantz     Re: svn commit: r158303 - httpd/httpd/trunk/buildconf Tue, 22 Mar, 00:38
William A. Rowe, Jr.       Re: svn commit: r158303 - httpd/httpd/trunk/buildconf Tue, 22 Mar, 17:33
Sander Striker     Re: svn commit: r158303 - httpd/httpd/trunk/buildconf Tue, 22 Mar, 04:58
Paul Querna       Re: svn commit: r158303 - httpd/httpd/trunk/buildconf Tue, 22 Mar, 05:11
William A. Rowe, Jr.         Re: svn commit: r158303 - httpd/httpd/trunk/buildconf Tue, 22 Mar, 21:22
Justin Erenkrantz           Re: svn commit: r158303 - httpd/httpd/trunk/buildconf Tue, 22 Mar, 22:02
Sander Striker             buildconf.nice, WAS: Re: svn commit: r158303 - httpd/httpd/trunk/buildconf Tue, 22 Mar, 22:20
William A. Rowe, Jr.             Re: svn commit: r158303 - httpd/httpd/trunk/buildconf Wed, 23 Mar, 00:02
Nathanael Noblet Http/APR Tue, 22 Mar, 03:44
Cliff Woolley   Re: Http/APR Tue, 22 Mar, 05:07
Rici Lake Re: svn commit: r125465 httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ldap/util_ldap.c Tue, 22 Mar, 05:12
Paul Querna   Re: svn commit: r125465 httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ldap/util_ldap.c Tue, 22 Mar, 21:29
Graham Leggett     Re: svn commit: r125465 httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ldap/util_ldap.c Tue, 22 Mar, 22:17
Rici Lake       Re: svn commit: r125465 httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ldap/util_ldap.c Tue, 22 Mar, 23:02
Graham Leggett         Re: svn commit: r125465 httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ldap/util_ldap.c Tue, 22 Mar, 23:33
William A. Rowe, Jr.     Re: svn commit: r125465 httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ldap/util_ldap.c Wed, 23 Mar, 00:04
Henri Schomäcker no results with apr_env_get Tue, 22 Mar, 12:08
Jeff Trawick   Re: no results with apr_env_get Tue, 22 Mar, 15:56
Henri Gomez iSeries Apache 2.0.x - where is ap_mpm_query equivalent ? Tue, 22 Mar, 14:19
Henri Gomez   Re: iSeries Apache 2.0.x - where is ap_mpm_query equivalent ? Wed, 23 Mar, 08:45
Re: svn commit: r157948 - in httpd/httpd/trunk/srclib/pcre: pcre.c study.c
Joe Orton   Re: svn commit: r157948 - in httpd/httpd/trunk/srclib/pcre: pcre.c study.c Tue, 22 Mar, 15:44
Rici Lake util_ldap.c redux Tue, 22 Mar, 23:52
Sergey Velikanov [UzPAK] gprof and apache Wed, 23 Mar, 11:17
Brian Akins "Supported" Compilers Wed, 23 Mar, 17:11
TOKI...@aol.com   Re: "Supported" Compilers Wed, 23 Mar, 12:52
André Malo   Re: "Supported" Compilers Wed, 23 Mar, 17:21
Justin Erenkrantz   Re: "Supported" Compilers Wed, 23 Mar, 17:49
Rodent of Unusual Size [STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Mar 23 23:45:24 2005 Thu, 24 Mar, 04:45
Rodent of Unusual Size [STATUS] (httpd-2.1) Wed Mar 23 23:45:33 2005 Thu, 24 Mar, 04:45
Jens Stutte Enhancement of mod_charset_lite Thu, 24 Mar, 11:47
Backport of AllowEncodedSlashes to Apache 1.3
Aaron Bannert   Backport of AllowEncodedSlashes to Apache 1.3 Fri, 25 Mar, 00:38
Aaron Bannert     Re: Backport of AllowEncodedSlashes to Apache 1.3 Tue, 29 Mar, 16:43
Jim Jagielski     Re: Backport of AllowEncodedSlashes to Apache 1.3 Wed, 30 Mar, 13:13
Jim Jagielski   Re: Backport of AllowEncodedSlashes to Apache 1.3 Tue, 29 Mar, 16:47
William A. Rowe, Jr.     Re: Backport of AllowEncodedSlashes to Apache 1.3 Tue, 29 Mar, 21:08
Aaron Bannert     Re: Backport of AllowEncodedSlashes to Apache 1.3 Wed, 30 Mar, 00:28
Jim Jagielski   Re: Backport of AllowEncodedSlashes to Apache 1.3 Tue, 29 Mar, 22:56
William A. Rowe, Jr.     Re: Backport of AllowEncodedSlashes to Apache 1.3 Tue, 29 Mar, 23:46
Aaron Bannert       Re: Backport of AllowEncodedSlashes to Apache 1.3 Wed, 30 Mar, 00:27
Marco Schinkel Bind mod_proxy to a specific ip address for outgoing requests Fri, 25 Mar, 21:18
Alexander Lazic 2.1 trunk => ab -v 2 segfault Sat, 26 Mar, 10:27
Michal Mertl problems with mod_proxy and mod_cache on 2.X Sat, 26 Mar, 15:03
Michal Mertl   Re: problems with mod_proxy and mod_cache on 2.X Sat, 26 Mar, 15:16
Graham Leggett     Re: problems with mod_proxy and mod_cache on 2.X Sun, 27 Mar, 15:28
Michal Mertl       Re: problems with mod_proxy and mod_cache on 2.X Mon, 28 Mar, 15:04
Graham Leggett   Re: problems with mod_proxy and mod_cache on 2.X Sun, 27 Mar, 15:24
Michal Mertl     Re: problems with mod_proxy and mod_cache on 2.X Mon, 28 Mar, 14:58
Sander Striker Time for 2.0.54? Tue, 29 Mar, 00:46
Re: svn commit: r159356 - httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES
Paul Querna   Re: svn commit: r159356 - httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES Tue, 29 Mar, 08:50
Jeff Trawick     Re: svn commit: r159356 - httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES Tue, 29 Mar, 11:12
Bill Stoddard       Re: svn commit: r159356 - httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES Tue, 29 Mar, 13:24
Message list« Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Box list
Sep 2014119
Aug 2014167
Jul 2014192
Jun 2014174
May 2014121
Apr 2014287
Mar 2014292
Feb 2014264
Jan 2014243
Dec 2013265
Nov 2013377
Oct 2013233
Sep 2013291
Aug 2013186
Jul 2013253
Jun 2013240
May 2013266
Apr 2013152
Mar 2013188
Feb 2013252
Jan 2013258
Dec 2012131
Nov 2012168
Oct 2012106
Sep 2012169
Aug 2012279
Jul 2012184
Jun 201293
May 2012135
Apr 2012220
Mar 2012347
Feb 2012391
Jan 2012445
Dec 2011293
Nov 2011505
Oct 2011242
Sep 2011315
Aug 2011401
Jul 2011224
Jun 2011202
May 2011283
Apr 2011141
Mar 2011308
Feb 2011301
Jan 2011238
Dec 2010189
Nov 2010332
Oct 2010305
Sep 2010265
Aug 2010227
Jul 2010173
Jun 2010483
May 2010165
Apr 2010161
Mar 2010283
Feb 2010240
Jan 2010238
Dec 2009262
Nov 2009530
Oct 2009530
Sep 2009568
Aug 2009259
Jul 2009364
Jun 2009265
May 2009330
Apr 2009196
Mar 2009358
Feb 2009221
Jan 2009339
Dec 2008338
Nov 2008182
Oct 2008378
Sep 2008237
Aug 2008162
Jul 2008120
Jun 2008257
May 2008320
Apr 2008406
Mar 2008203
Feb 2008356
Jan 2008423
Dec 2007336
Nov 2007270
Oct 2007382
Sep 2007520
Aug 2007391
Jul 2007208
Jun 2007267
May 2007309
Apr 2007278
Mar 2007308
Feb 2007316
Jan 2007304
Dec 2006280
Nov 2006237
Oct 2006394
Sep 2006287
Aug 2006250
Jul 2006570
Jun 2006313
May 2006367
Apr 2006548
Mar 2006408
Feb 2006328
Jan 2006438
Dec 2005613
Nov 2005711
Oct 2005598
Sep 2005456
Aug 2005776
Jul 2005457
Jun 2005384
May 2005321
Apr 2005359
Mar 2005466
Feb 2005380
Jan 2005206
Dec 2004398
Nov 2004538
Oct 2004371
Sep 2004539
Aug 2004527
Jul 2004325
Jun 2004468
May 2004317
Apr 2004234
Mar 2004606
Feb 2004357
Jan 2004358
Dec 2003344
Nov 2003580
Oct 2003336
Sep 2003272
Aug 2003262
Jul 2003323
Jun 2003424
May 2003447
Apr 2003355
Mar 2003684
Feb 2003570
Jan 2003534
Dec 2002443
Nov 2002531
Oct 2002749
Sep 2002901
Aug 2002802
Jul 2002716
Jun 2002910
May 20021024
Apr 20021369
Mar 20021093
Feb 20021143
Jan 20021069
Dec 2001682
Nov 20011268
Oct 20011110
Sep 20011258
Aug 20011708
Jul 20011052
Jun 2001737
May 2001644
Apr 2001957
Mar 2001611
Feb 20011465
Jan 20011416
Dec 2000906
Nov 20001082
Oct 20001016
Sep 2000645
Aug 2000729
Jul 20001016
Jun 20001602
May 20001092
Apr 20001358
Mar 20001504
Feb 2000586
Jan 2000836
Dec 1999590
Nov 1999601
Oct 1999746
Sep 1999378
Aug 19991034
Jul 1999678
Jun 1999626
May 1999619
Apr 1999697
Mar 1999678
Feb 1999325
Jan 1999794
Dec 1998575
Nov 1998407
Oct 1998475
Sep 1998737
Aug 1998557
Jul 1998907
Jun 1998858
May 1998958
Apr 19981234
Mar 19981320
Feb 19981328
Jan 19981686
Dec 1997879
Nov 19971103
Oct 19971078
Sep 19971171
Aug 19971881
Jul 19971809
Jun 19971820
May 1997622
Apr 1997938
Mar 1997685
Feb 19971176
Jan 19971927
Dec 19961420
Nov 1996798
Oct 1996605
Sep 1996644
Aug 1996994
Jul 19961617
Jun 19961747
May 19961210
Apr 19961102
Mar 1996698
Feb 19961000
Jan 1996550
Dec 1995832
Nov 1995628
Oct 1995589
Sep 1995715
Aug 19951049
Jul 1995413
Jun 1995255
May 1995390
Apr 1995998
Mar 1995699