Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 68912 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2005 14:23:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2005 14:23:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 29113 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2005 14:23:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 29065 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2005 14:23:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 29052 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2005 14:23:09 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of trawick@gmail.com designates 64.233.170.195 as permitted sender) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (HELO rproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.170.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 06:23:08 -0800 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id y7so413961rne for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 06:23:06 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=Q3stlhxZnndTM72h8BbyedrDtapRRxHs3E1uToH6tuR92OkEkfCWrAOxa70iRagaNEOtDWgNGxxI8HTHn3SsfFlvHbjx+yyf18sUjUdx2Pl6s/0O8mNuIMctfAOD90tIv3cmLNcoZ+S12zHCdPCZxJYKcPiA3H3Df427mAxWmNs= Received: by 10.38.1.73 with SMTP id 73mr1222274rna; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 06:23:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.39.2.68 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 06:23:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 09:23:06 -0500 From: Jeff Trawick Reply-To: Jeff Trawick To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: scrap dbmmanage in favor of htdbm for 2.2? document as deprecated in 2.0? In-Reply-To: <1404e59105033011325256e25e@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: <20050330121554.00006bdb@fe-pc-323.int.cinetic.de> <1404e59105033011325256e25e@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:32:25 -0500, Eric Covener wrote: > On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:15:54 +0200, Andr=E9 Malo wrote: > > -0 since htdbm lacks the group features (afaics). >=20 > Probably in need of a syntax and/or doc change but the following seems > to work with authz_dbm >=20 > htdbm -t mydb myuser "group1,group2,group3:my comment" >=20 > (-t is "last parameter used for comments field") Ouch. So when people have been adding comments currently with no preceding colon, mod_authz_dbm would interpret that as a group?=20 Likely the group wouldn't match, but still... Sounds like the comments parameter shouldn't allow embedded colon (to avoid misinterpretation), and there should also be a group parameter (-g group1[,group2]...), and the comment handling should put the comment in the right place? (i.e., leave group field properly set to empty or a list of groups)