Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 89553 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2005 05:30:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2005 05:30:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 76912 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2005 05:29:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 76851 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2005 05:29:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 76836 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2005 05:29:59 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from force-elite.com (HELO utopia.in.force-elite.com) (216.255.199.145) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 21:29:57 -0800 X-AuthUser: chip@force-elite.com Received: from [10.0.0.42] (10.0.0.42:60421) by utopia.in.force-elite.com with [XMail 1.17 (Linux/Ix86) ESMTP Server] id for from ; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 21:29:49 -0800 Message-ID: <422FDB4D.1010904@force-elite.com> Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 21:29:49 -0800 From: Paul Querna User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Mar 9 23:45:36 2005 References: <200503100445.j2A4jbEg023247@Boron.MeepZor.Com> <422FD9AA.7090302@ptc.com> In-Reply-To: <422FD9AA.7090302@ptc.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Jess Holle wrote: > Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > >> CURRENT VOTES: >> >> * Promote mod_ldap and mod_auth_ldap from experimental to >> non experimental status. >> +1: bnicholes, wrowe >> +0: minfrin (wait till the last cache bugs are ironed out) >> >> > I think we're pretty well there -- at least in 2.0.53 plus the recent > patch from Josh Fenlason to cover the case when a shared cache file is > not specified on a platform supporting shared memory. > > Thoughts? > It was promoted in 2.1. Why change the status for 2.0.x?