Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-46457-apmail-httpd-dev-archive=httpd.apache.org@httpd.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 26982 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2005 08:04:55 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2005 08:04:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 11454 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2005 08:04:45 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 11205 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2005 08:04:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@httpd.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@httpd.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 11161 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2005 08:04:43 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=10.0
	tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO,RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from ip9.elmar.co.il (HELO ip9.elmar.co.il) (192.117.252.25)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 00:04:42 -0800
Received: from netmask.it (ip9.elmar.co.il [192.168.1.9])
	by ip9.elmar.co.il (8.12.1-20030917/8.12.1) with ESMTP id j297le7U002938
	for <dev@httpd.apache.org>; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:47:40 +0200
Sender: root@localhost.localdomain
Message-ID: <422EAA1C.1743009B@netmask.it>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 09:47:40 +0200
From: Eli Marmor <marmor@netmask.it>
Organization: Netmask (El-Mar) Internet Technologies
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.08 [Hebrew Support by elmar.co.il (X11; I;
 Linux 2.4.8-26mdk i686)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mod_cache, expand impact of CacheIgnoreCacheControl
References: <422D14B3.2040900@apache.org>
 <20050308163121.GO4351@scotch.ics.uci.edu> <422DDA6F.2070108@apache.org>
 <20050308170931.GP4351@scotch.ics.uci.edu> <422DDD82.A9C8AFB6@netmask.it>
 <422DE7EA.9050405@apache.org> <422DEB15.EF2F6A09@netmask.it>
 <5C778DDF874B24DCA4854DE0@st-augustin.ics.uci.edu>
 <422E025F.4030702@slive.ca> <422DFF20.F2D6A6AD@netmask.it>
 <7D378A73EA337295363DB806@st-augustin.ics.uci.edu> <422E0A29.90704@slive.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Joshua Slive wrote:
> 
> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > --On Tuesday, March 8, 2005 9:38 PM +0200 Eli Marmor <marmor@netmask.it>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> It depends if you need it only for the server configuration, or for
> >> dir_config;
> >> In the latter case, you don't have another choice, you just NEED the +-
> >
> > Actually, cache can't respect any dir config's (because it is a quick
> > handler) so Joshua is right - we shouldn't follow the +-.  -- justin
> 
> I don't think it matters anyway.  Note that AllowOverride handles dir
> configs.  All the +/- syntax buys you is being able to write
> 
> Directive Foo Bar Baz
> <Directory /foo>
> Directive -Bar +Boo
> </Directory>
> 
> Instead of
> Directive Foo Bar Baz
> <Directory /foo>
> Directive Foo Baz Boo
> </Directory>

Both of you are right;
What I meant to say was that in dir config, you MUST have +-; In server
config, you MAY have +-.

Time to define the exact directive and names?

-- 
Eli Marmor
marmor@netmask.it
Netmask (El-Mar) Internet Technologies Ltd.
__________________________________________________________
Tel.:   +972-9-766-1020          8 Yad-Harutzim St.
Fax.:   +972-9-766-1314          P.O.B. 7004
Mobile: +972-50-5237338          Kfar-Saba 44641, Israel