Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-46451-apmail-httpd-dev-archive=httpd.apache.org@httpd.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 37878 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2005 20:25:25 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2005 20:25:25 -0000
Received: (qmail 74680 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2005 20:25:20 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 74630 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2005 20:25:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@httpd.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@httpd.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 74615 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2005 20:25:19 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0
	tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (HELO
 out1.smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.25)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 12:25:18 -0800
Received: from frontend3.messagingengine.com (frontend3.internal
 [10.202.2.152])
	by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A63C60173
	for <dev@httpd.apache.org>; Tue,  8 Mar 2005 15:25:14 -0500 (EST)
X-Sasl-enc: 4SMgmrDF+ul4qW61svqfrg 1110313514
Received: from [132.211.187.132] (unknown [132.211.187.132])
	by frontend3.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 011B826A03
	for <dev@httpd.apache.org>; Tue,  8 Mar 2005 15:25:13 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <422E0A29.90704@slive.ca>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 15:25:13 -0500
From: Joshua Slive <joshua@slive.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0+ (Windows/20050301)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mod_cache, expand impact of CacheIgnoreCacheControl
References: <422D14B3.2040900@apache.org>
 <20050308163121.GO4351@scotch.ics.uci.edu> <422DDA6F.2070108@apache.org>
 <20050308170931.GP4351@scotch.ics.uci.edu> <422DDD82.A9C8AFB6@netmask.it>
 <422DE7EA.9050405@apache.org> <422DEB15.EF2F6A09@netmask.it>
 <5C778DDF874B24DCA4854DE0@st-augustin.ics.uci.edu>
 <422E025F.4030702@slive.ca> <422DFF20.F2D6A6AD@netmask.it>
 <7D378A73EA337295363DB806@st-augustin.ics.uci.edu>
In-Reply-To: <7D378A73EA337295363DB806@st-augustin.ics.uci.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> --On Tuesday, March 8, 2005 9:38 PM +0200 Eli Marmor <marmor@netmask.it> 
> wrote:
> 
>> It depends if you need it only for the server configuration, or for
>> dir_config;
>> In the latter case, you don't have another choice, you just NEED the +-
> 
> 
> Actually, cache can't respect any dir config's (because it is a quick 
> handler) so Joshua is right - we shouldn't follow the +-.  -- justin

I don't think it matters anyway.  Note that AllowOverride handles dir 
configs.  All the +/- syntax buys you is being able to write

Directive Foo Bar Baz
<Directory /foo>
Directive -Bar +Boo
</Directory>

Instead of
Directive Foo Bar Baz
<Directory /foo>
Directive Foo Baz Boo
</Directory>

Joshua.