Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 29206 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2005 13:32:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2005 13:32:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 51700 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2005 13:32:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 51675 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2005 13:32:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 51658 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2005 13:32:48 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from relay2.ptc.com (HELO relay2.ptc.com) (12.11.148.122) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 05:32:46 -0800 Received: from unknown (HELO HQ-EXFE2.ptcnet.ptc.com) (132.253.201.63) by relay2.ptc.com with ESMTP; 01 Feb 2005 08:33:31 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="3.88,169,1102309200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="8701736:sNHT20565940" Received: from [132.253.41.42] ([132.253.41.42]) by HQ-EXFE2.ptcnet.ptc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Tue, 1 Feb 2005 08:32:41 -0500 Message-ID: <41FF84F9.2020503@ptc.com> Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 07:32:41 -0600 From: Jess Holle User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Time for 2.0.53? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070700010009080500090104" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Feb 2005 13:32:41.0707 (UTC) FILETIME=[812EC3B0:01C50862] X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070700010009080500090104 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Brad Nicholes wrote: >>>>jessh@ptc.com Monday, January 31, 2005 2:26:09 PM >>> >>>> >>>> >>I'd love to see the LDAP socket timeout configuration stuff make it in >> >> >>for 2.0.53! >> >>-- >>Jess Holle >> >> >justin > > > >Me too ;) Any voters out there? I've already cast my vote >(Obviously) > >>>From the looks of the STATUS file, there appears to be a number of >backports with 3 +1's that just need to be backported. > >Brad > > I don't have a vote, but I believe the socket timeout configuration is necessary to address issues seen with firewall timeouts and the LDAP connections held open by Apache. -- Jess Holle --------------070700010009080500090104 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Brad Nicholes wrote:

jessh@ptc.com Monday, January 31, 2005 2:26:09 PM >>>

I'd love to see the LDAP socket timeout configuration stuff make it in

for 2.0.53!

--
Jess Holle

justin


Me too ;)  Any voters out there?  I've already cast my vote
(Obviously)

>From the looks of the STATUS file, there appears to be a number of
backports with 3 +1's that just need to be backported.

Brad

I don't have a vote, but I believe the socket timeout configuration is necessary to address issues seen with firewall timeouts and the LDAP connections held open by Apache.

--
Jess Holle

--------------070700010009080500090104--