httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stas Bekman <s...@stason.org>
Subject Re: mod_status and Req
Date Thu, 03 Feb 2005 04:11:15 GMT
Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Stas Bekman wrote:
> 
>>Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>>>Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>--On Wednesday, February 2, 2005 1:43 PM -0500 Jim Jagielski 
>>>><jim@jaguNET.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Any reason why we don't enable reporting of Req? I have
>>>>>a 2.1 patch ready to go, but I don't know why we don't
>>>>>do this....
>>>>
>>>>I have no earthly idea what you are talking about.  =)
>>>>
>>>>Can you please provide some more details?  -- justin
>>
>>>Already committed (love CTR). Basically, the 'Req' value displayed by
>>>mod_status is always 0 since we never update the required worker fields
>>>that note start and stop processing time.
>>
>>Whoah! wait long enough and the work will be done by someone else :) I was 
>>just about to get this done :)
>>
>>Jim, what would it take to backport it to 2.0? I see that 149550 changes 
>>ap_time_process_request API, but it's an internal API, no?
>>
> 
> 
> Piece o' cake. I'll add it to 2.0's STATUS. Yeah, the ap_time_process_request
> API changed (for the better, IMO, since the worker "info" should
> be opaque(sp?)), but it's just internal. At least, we don't declare
> it as public :)

thanks Jim. and 3 +1s were added already. if it makes into 2.0.53 that 
would be great.

-- 
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/     mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com

Mime
View raw message