httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: mod_status and Req
Date Thu, 03 Feb 2005 02:45:54 GMT
Stas Bekman wrote:
> 
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > 
> >>--On Wednesday, February 2, 2005 1:43 PM -0500 Jim Jagielski 
> >><jim@jaguNET.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Any reason why we don't enable reporting of Req? I have
> >>>a 2.1 patch ready to go, but I don't know why we don't
> >>>do this....
> >>
> >>I have no earthly idea what you are talking about.  =)
> >>
> >>Can you please provide some more details?  -- justin
> 
> > Already committed (love CTR). Basically, the 'Req' value displayed by
> > mod_status is always 0 since we never update the required worker fields
> > that note start and stop processing time.
> 
> Whoah! wait long enough and the work will be done by someone else :) I was 
> just about to get this done :)
> 
> Jim, what would it take to backport it to 2.0? I see that 149550 changes 
> ap_time_process_request API, but it's an internal API, no?
> 

Piece o' cake. I'll add it to 2.0's STATUS. Yeah, the ap_time_process_request
API changed (for the better, IMO, since the worker "info" should
be opaque(sp?)), but it's just internal. At least, we don't declare
it as public :)


-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
    "There 10 types of people: those who read binary and everyone else."

Mime
View raw message